Obama’s TREASON. (The Extra Caps Are For Extra TREASON!)

I’m finding it difficult to concentrate today, thanks to a nasty headache, and don’t feel quite up to swallowing the prescription-strength crazy.  So I’ve decided to take a couple of buffered wingnuts and just sit here in the dark until the throbbing subsides.  First up, our old friend Shermp, the Wistfulest Stooge™, sits down with a cashiered Navy man who recently charged Obama with treason.  Or maybe she just read his criminal complaint and imagined they were having a conversation, because the whole transcript consists largely of dueling blockquotes from “patriot” email alerts, so she either interviewed him via spam, or we surprised Sher as she was cheating on a Turing test.

Can the US Constitution survive dictator Obama?

In light of the now almost daily bombardment of the US Constitution by the sitting US Commander in Chief, the question ‘is our Constitution still the law of the land?’ is increasingly being asked by We-the-People.

Other questions being asked by We-the-People are:

“Are those real?”

“What part of the mind blocks happy relationships?” (page 409)

“What’s with all the fucking hyphens?”

and

“Mr. O’Reilly, when you inflate the bladder in your dewlap, is that designed to intimidate predators, or is it just a courting ritual?”

The problem of Barack Hussein Obama seeming not to be a natural-born citizen is still an extremely salient issue…Recently, retired Navy Commander Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III filed a criminal complaint of Treason against Barack Hussein Obama. This has prompted other individuals around the country to do the same. As our Republic now stands on the brink of complete collapse, I thought an interview of Commander Fitzpatrick was in order.

It’ll help pass the time until the roaming bands of cannibals arrive.

The Interview

Sher: Walt, you’ve caused quite a stir with your criminal complaint of treason against Barack Obama — the person I call the usurper to the US presidency and the US’ dictator in chief. Suffice it to say, our representative republic is now in jeopardy as it has never before experienced. What you have done is an extraordinarily gutsy move. With even our lawmakers seeming to cower in fear of going against him, how did you garner the courage to fight against Obama’s expanding tyranny?

Walt: “Obedient to the Constitution — my sworn duty, Mr. Obama, is to stand against what you stand for. You are not my president. You are not my commander in chief.” (Quoted from the federal criminal complaint naming Mr. Obama in the crime of TREASON).

Wolfram Alpha is a more scintillating conversationalist.

General Robert E. Lee put it this way: “Duty is the most sublime word in our language. Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more. You should never wish to do less.”

Ah yes, the wisdom of Robert E. Lee on…duty.

Walt: Mr. Obama is named in the commission of the crime of TREASON by a commissioned officer in the U.S. military. TREASON is the only criminal act our Constitution records.

Say, what did General Robert E. Lee have to say about TREASON?  I’m sure it was pithy.

Mr. Obama is described in the criminal complaint as a ‘foreign born domestic enemy and a traitor.’ This simple declarative sentence is intended to state clearly Mr. Obama meets elements of the crime of TREASON by being an enemy of the United States and our constitutional form of government. It states also Mr. Obama adheres to other U.S. enemies and gives them aid and comfort (Obama’s criminal assistants).

You might even call them Obama’s criminal confederates.

It’s been two months. Mr. Obama admits his TREASON.

Really?  I must’ve missed that in the paper — I guess I really ought to at least glance at the front page after I finish reading “Cathy.”

I opine one tactic is to quash complaints quietly and without further notice by disqualifying people attempting to remove Mr. Obama from office by force of law. What more do you need to see or hear?

Not a thing.  Your delusion’s good enough for me, Commander.

Our Constitution no longer works. Our government, however contemporaneously described, has turned against its people.

And the turtle called Gamera is approaching the city!

Sher: You stated in your criminal complaint against Obama:… I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON.”

What a coincidence.  I Accuse My Parents…of TREASON!

As a retired US Navy officer, how much support do you believe the US Military will give to Obama’s despotic syndicate and, subsequently, operate against the American people?

Walt: I don’t know what I don’t know. “How much support,” the strength of military support is impossible to measure. The first sentence of the federal criminal complaint for TREASON reads as follows: “I have observed and extensively recorded treacherous attacks by military-political aristocrats against the United States Constitution for twenty years.” The alert and warning that senior military commanders — described as “command racketeers” — have been no more obedient to the Constitution since the end of the Civil War than Mr. Obama has been during his lifetime.

And anyone familiar with the history of organized crime remembers who won the long, bloody struggle between the Five Crime Families — the Bonnanos, the Gambinos, the Colombos, the Genoveses, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Mr. Obama criminal ascension to the White House has afforded modern day command racketeers an opportunity to more completely and effectively efface the Constitution than ever in any of their lifetimes. Mr. Obama’s goals and the goals of the command criminals are identical.

Contrarily, there are those Veterans (active duty and retired) who refuse to perjure or forsake their oaths to the Constitution and see their duty clearly (duty…there’s that word again).

Oh great.  Commander McBragg thinks he’s in Starship Troopers!

Sher: When we talked, you also indicated that those who knew and know that Obama was not born in the USA are also culpable and can be charged with treason and/or conspiring to treason — correct? Speaking of which, didn’t Fox News Channel’s Uber-leftist Shepard Smith recently stated on-air…”There are these crazies out there who want to pretend Obama’s not a citizen of the United States”…If Smith has proof that Obama is a natural-born citizen, isn’t he legally obligated to provide it?

Walt: FOX News Channel Correspondent Shepard Smith has named himself a witness in the Obama TREASON trial. Correspondent Smith is advised to exercise his constitutional protections against self-incrimination inasmuch as Mr. Smith won’t be going to Washington. Instead Mr. Smith goes to prison for his complicity in Obama’s TREASON rendering Smith as criminally accountable.

Shepard Smith.  History’s greatest monster.

A legitimate president and commander in chief is the leader of the Western world. As commander in chief he is the CEO of America’s largest employer (the U.S. military and its infrastructure), the world’s largest law firm (the JAG Corps), and the most powerful and fierce military force history has ever known.

And for all of that I’m supposed to take the word of Shep Smith that Obama legitimately holds office?  In an earlier question you asked me who are the power brokers behind Obama. I answered in general. Here, allow me to be more focused and specific.  Shepard Smith is one of those responsible, one of those behind the curtain pulling the levers, one of the outlaw assistants in Obama’s criminal adventures.

There exists an opportunity in the Obama TREASON trial to use Shepard Smith as the vehicle that exposes major media as a leading actor in crimes against the Constitution.

Laconically: Mr. Smith committed TREASON by saying what he did.

Well, at least his treachery was concise.  If there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s loquacious TREASON.

Sher: Barack Obama is taking over the country and turning it into his own totalitarian empire with almost lightning speed. Whom do you believe is the real power, if any, behind and supporting him?

Walt: I don’t know what I don’t know.

I smell a catchy slogan!  Get CafePress on the line!

I can speculate as well as you, but at the end of the day all we have are our opinions which may be different and which may be competing. But, this question gets to the heart of the reason why the federal criminal complaint for TREASON was advanced: We need to find out…and we can with the speed of heat!

Oh swell — now he’s coming on to her.

The handling of Mr. Obama’s TREASON works to reconcile the question regarding whether the Constitution remains the Law of the Land or not. Mr. Obama’s TREASON trial also works to stop the attack against the Constitution, neutralize it, and then work to the Constitution’s restoration. Along the way we get behind the curtain to see who’s pulling the levers!

Because, you know, he’s a negro, and doesn’t know how to operate the drapes.

Allow me to add that the Constitution’s Impeachment process does not reach to protect Mr. Obama. Mr. Obama is not legitimately holding office. The TREASON trial stands Obama in the dock like any other person (citizen, legal or illegal alien). Mr. Obama is now caught in the crime of TREASON and is rendered nothing more than a commoner;a smug street thug punk criminal.

I’m going to arrange a play date between Commander McBragg and Pastor Swank.

Sher: There seems to be a growing malaise amongst many US citizens that they can do nothing about Obama’s destruction of the US Constitution — via his ignoring it — and his reconstruction of our republic into his personal fiefdom except complain. With your own filing of the criminal treason complaint…

Ahem.  I think you mean TREASON, Sher.

…How do you suggest each individual proceed toward filing their own treason complaint against him?

“Well, I’m glad you asked.  I’m having a TREASON complaint filing seminar this Sunday at the Barstow Ramada…”

Walt: I do not agree there’s a “malaise.” By the way, I hate the word malaise ever since Jimmy Carter uttered it eons ago.Malaise is not what made America great!

Creamy sandwich spread is!  We call it…Malaisonnaise!

It just isn’t a thread in the American fabric. What I see instead is growing frustration, bewilderment, and anger that is the sure product of betrayal. Betrayed by Obama, by the politicians, by the military aristocrats…

Any second now, and he’s going to start knitting the names of his enemies into a sweater like Madame Defarge.

Given a way to fight back, in the rebirth of the Constitution, We The People are forming Grand Juries like a slowly heating pop-corn machine. Indictments and presentments are already handed down. Advance of the extant federal criminal complaint for TREASON has become frenetic.

Seriously, dude.  Get on Pastor Swank’s good side now, before he sues your ass for theft of anti-intellectual property.

Well, my head’s really splitting now, but I think I need a palate cleanser, a little sorbet of stupid before I crawl off to bed.  I wonder what Jonah’s up to…

Jonah Goldberg:  Et Tu, Big Business?

When liberals hear conservatives decry the death of capitalism, they titter and roll their eyes. “Oh, you paranoid right-wingers! You see Bolsheviks around every corner.”

But such exasperation is the exhalation of concentrated ignorance.

You know, Jonah, giving fancy names to your flatulence doesn’t make people any less inclined to move away from you on the subway.

Posted by scott on June 19th, 2009

When I Was Young My Upper Lip Was A Jungle, Thick, Steamy and Fecund

Sadly, it seems that being “founder, editor and CEO of WND and a nationally syndicated columnist with Creators Syndicate,” isn’t enough for Joseph Farah anymore.  Something’s missing from his life.  Relevance?  Excitement?  That old tomcat sway in the hips?  Who can say.  But it’s clear that the prospect of writing his syndicated column, then enjoying a complete breakfast, before retiring to the scullery to boot black his mustache is no longer enough to get him out of bed in the morning; which may explain why he’s still clinging to the Obama birth certificate issue.  What, after all, is Ahab without the white whale?  Just a grumpy fishermen with a lot of spare shoes.

Speaking of harpooning a dead cetacean, the last time I checked World Net Daily, the first thirteen articles on the front page were all related to Farah’s hobbyhorse, including an exclusive by Joseph himself explaining Why Obama wants to hide birth certificate

Since I began my quixotic campaign to uncover Barack Obama’s birth certificate, many have asked me about the president’s possible motives for hiding it with such tenacity and diligence.  I think there are many plausible motives:

• Perhaps something in that birth certificate, if it indeed exists, would contradict assertions Obama has made about his life’s story. These might even involve his true parental heritage. Without a real birth certificate, no one really knows who his parents were. So it is ridiculous even to speculate about whether citizenship could be conferred upon him by his mother, when we don’t know for sure who his mother is.

So just to recap, Farah demands to see Obama’s birth certificate, and when the document in question is supplied, he haughtily declares that itdoes not exist!  Which is kind of a psychotic, but entertaining twist on the Hans Christian Anderson original, with the peasants all standing around in the nude while a child cries out, “the Emperor is overdressed for the occasion!”

Anyway, Joseph would merely like to point out that Stanley Ann Dunham may have only pretended to give birth to Barack Obama, when in reality his  mother was an entirely different white woman from Kansas, whose progeny Stanley Ann swiped, Gypsy-like, because she wanted to give her parents the mulatto grandson they’d always wanted.

Perhaps it reveals a foreign birth, as Hawaii allowed for in 1961 while still issuing the “certification of live birth” we have seen posted on his website. Or perhaps it will show just what Obama has claimed all along – a birth in Hawaii to two officially non-citizen parents, for the purpose of establishing “natural born citizenship” under the Constitution.

Or because that’s where his mother lived, when to school, and where she met and married his father.

What do I mean by that last possibility?

That the depth of your douchebaggery is exceeded only by the breadth of your porn ‘stache?

Well, as you know, in 2008, the Senate of the United States held hearings to determine if one of the presidential candidates fulfilled the requirement of being a “natural born citizen.” It wasn’t Barack Obama. It was John McCain, who was born on a U.S. military base overseas to two U.S. citizens.

On April 10 of last year, two senators, both Democrats, Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Claire McCaskill of Missouri, introduced a resolution into upper house expressing a sense of the Senate that McCain was indeed a “natural born citizen.”

It’s interesting what Leahy had to say on the subject: “Because he was born to American citizens (emphasis added), there is no doubt in my mind that Senator McCain is a natural born citizen. I expect that this will be a unanimous resolution of the U.S. Senate.”

And, indeed it was. It was also, interestingly, the only such hearing held by the Congress on the subject of “natural born citizenship” and its application to the 2008 presidential race. Why was that interesting? Because everyone involved in this process knew – or should have known – that the life story told by Barack Obama would raise far more doubts about his eligibility than McCain’s.

And yet, strangely, it’s only the desperate, donation-cadging proprietor of an online supermarket tabloid who seems to care.  Clearly, we need a new Senate.

Notice Leahy did not say one parent citizen would qualify a child for “natural born citizenship.” He indicted it would take two to tango.

Is that what he indicted?  Well, no, I don’t believe use of the plural constitutes an actual indictment, and anyway, I think it’s still a little early to get the Grand Jury involved, don’t you?

By the way, Obama voted for this resolution, so he obviously agrees with the definition of what constitutes a “natural born citizen” – the offspring of two U.S. citizens.

Or the offspring of one U.S. citizen.  Or the offspring of two foreign nationals born in the United States, since I’m pretty sure the 14th Amendment (“all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States”) still trumps a non-binding Sense of the Senate resolution.

Now, I don’t know who Barack Obama’s parents are, because I have never seen his birth certificate. All I’ve seen is a facsimile of a “certification of live birth” on the Internet. That document, even if genuine, proves nothing about Obama’s birth in Hawaii or who his parents were. Hawaii had a very slipshod practice in 1961 of issuing these documents to babies born outside the country and listing parents who may not have been the parents at all.

“Western standards of systematized record-keeping are beyond those cannibals!”

But I do know who Barack Obama claims his parents were. According to him, neither one of them was an American citizen able to confer natural born citizenship on a child. One, Barack Obama Sr., was a foreign national from Kenya, and the other, Stanley Ann Dunham, was too young to have qualified under the law for bestowing that privilege on her son, even if the father had been a citizen and even in the unlikely event Obama was actually born in Hawaii!

Um, FAIL, as I believe the kids say, Joe.  Even if you’re unacquainted with the Constitution, I’m sure that as a right wing trope conduit, you’re familiar with the term “anchor baby.”  If not, I’d suggest you ask Michelle Malkin.

So, if we are to take Obama at his word, he is not a natural born citizen and not eligible to serve as president.

But then, everything he says is a lie, so we’re kind of back to square one.

If he is to be judged by the same standard as his opponent in the race, there is no way he qualifies. That’s what Leahy said. That’s what Chertoff said. That’s what the law says.

Says you.

But let me remind you all, in case you hadn’t considered this: Obama plans to run for re-election in 2012. And that’s why we can never, ever let this matter rest.

And it’s due to just that kind of perseverance — specifically, his refusal to let the matter of Free Silver ever rest — that William Jennings Bryan is remembered as one of our greatest Presidents.

Posted by scott on Thursday, June 18th, 2009 at 12:25 pm

For those who may not have the habit of venturing over to WND to get their news, here are a few more of the vital stories on its front page today:
Is diabetes a bald-faced lie?
‘Mom, dad better than certified teachers’
Report says it’s ‘myth’ that ‘qualifications’ help
Amazing natural fertilizer doubles ‘crisis garden’ production!
Lesbian reporter covers own ‘gay’ wedding
Witches in church ban claim discrimination
I think that sort of puts the birth certificate thing in perspective.

Left by Green Eagle on June 18th, 2009

Wait, McCain had two parents? Weird. Maybe that’s what Leahy meant by ‘citizens’. The plural thing.

Left by Jay B. on June 18th, 2009

No one with even a casual familiarity with the topic could ever entertain tying natural rights to exacting grammatical standards like the formation of plurals or the agreement of pronouns with their antecedents. Imagine your right to vote determined by whether Michelle Bachmann’s use of “your” and “you’re”, trial by jury depending on Sarah Palin explaining the the finer points of apostrophe use, or the fate of the Free World resting on George W. Bush’s ability to pronounce “nuclear”.

Left by Doghouse Riley on June 18th, 2009

Like Superman, Obama is an illegal alien who saves our country and its inhabitants !

Left by H-Bob on June 18th, 2009

Scott swats the porn-stached one as effortlessly as Obama swats flies.
But . . . Don Ho is Hawaiian. Obama does not look like Don Ho. Therefore, he can’t be Hawaiian. I want to see a birth certificate, too.

Left by Diane on June 18th, 2009

“Stanley Ann Dunham, was too young to have qualified under the law for bestowing that privilege on her son…”
I was a young mother. That must be why no one asked me to bestow citizenship on my children. Oh no, who do I call? My children are illegal!
Anyway as for WND’s investigative tactics, I say Ride On there Soldier! The sky is green, you know it, I know it, keep up the good work son!

Left by kate on June 18th, 2009

While many wingnuts doubt Obama’s paternity, this guy goes a step and beyond and doubt Obama’s maternity.

Left by Hysterical Woman on June 18th, 2009

Okay. This is going to look like an attempt at shameless self promotion of my website but it’s not. It occurred to me that all of these people y’all write and comment about support the GOP. They see themselves as honest, hardworking, God loving (or fearing), decent human beings who have the right idea of how this country should run. So here’s some of their work. (Only 600 words, c’mon)
http://theweekincongress.com/Member/ED_ARCHIVE/JUN1209ED.htm

Left by Lost in Florida on June 18th, 2009

Until I see all the vault copy birth certificates of all the founding fathers I will consider the constitution void!

Left by he flips on June 18th, 2009

Amazing natural fertilizer doubles ‘crisis garden’ production!
To me, this sums up perfectly the output of the right wing noise machine.

Left by commie atheist on June 18th, 2009

It was also, interestingly, the only such hearing held by the Congress on the subject of “natural born citizenship” and its application to the 2008 presidential race. Why was that interesting? Because everyone involved in this process knew – or should have known – that the life story told by Barack Obama would raise far more doubts about his eligibility than McCain’s.
Or, perhaps, it was because McCain ADMITTED to being born away from the United States.
You know, just a thought…
Notice Leahy did not say one parent citizen would qualify a child for “natural born citizenship.” He indicted it would take two to tango.
Because Patrick Leahy, while old enough to actually have written parts of the Constitution, was not involved in that part of it, perhaps we should not rely on his opinion?
Stanley Ann Dunham, was too young to have qualified under the law for bestowing that privilege on her son, even if the father had been a citizen and even in the unlikely event Obama was actually born in Hawaii!
Hey! Farah is breaking news here!
TRIPP PALIN IS AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT FROM WOMBANIA!
After all, his mom was underage when he was born…

Left by actor212 on June 19th, 2009

Amazing natural fertilizer doubles ‘crisis garden’ production!
To me, this sums up perfectly the output of the right wing noise machine.
I didn’t know piss-soaked panties were fertilizer…

Left by actor212 on June 19th, 2009

I read the use of the plural in the sense of the Senate as referring specifically to McCain’s situation–i.e. that he had two American parents. I don’t think it was meant as an actual statement of general policy on eligibility for the presidency, just a statement on that case, which involved two parents. Which just shows that Farah can’t read.
But WTF about the whole age thing? Is he just pulling crap out of his ass now? I don’t think there’s any age limit in the fourteenth amendment.
Question: now, do all children of unmarried, young mothers suddenly lose their citizenship? Where should we deport them?

Left by WordSpinner on June 19th, 2009

Question: now, do all children of unmarried, young mothers suddenly lose their citizenship? Where should we deport them?
One them exotic places like Alaska.

Left by actor212 on June 19th, 2009

I wonder if by describing his campaign as “quixotic” he’s trying for a bit of self-deprecating humor, or if he actually doesn’t know what the word means.

Left by EJ on June 19th, 2009

or the fate of the Free World resting on George W. Bush’s ability to pronounce “nuclear”.
And don’t even get me started on the gerunds!

Left by Duros62 on June 19th, 2009

The second one, EJ.

Left by Bill S on June 19th, 2009

I was thinking that perhaps Farah’s moustache is obstructing his nostrils and preventing oxygen from reaching his brain, but then I realized that he’s most likely a dedicated mouth-breather, so there goes that theory.

Left by TM on June 19th, 2009

Maybe we need the EPA to regulate fumes from ‘stache waxes…

Left by tensor on June 20th, 2009

Unsurprisingly, Farah is utterly and demonstrably wrong about the age thing regarding Farah’s mother.
Farah’s claim rests on an interpretation of federal law at the time of Obama’s birth that citizenship was automatically granted to children born of at least one parent who had lived at least 10 years in the U.S., including five years after the age of 14–in other words, 19. Stanley Ann Dunham was three months shy of her 19th birthday when Obama was born. But subsequent acts of Congress not only changed the law from five years to two years, it made the changes retroactive to 1952. More here, citing no less a legal scholar than Eugene Volokh.
So, yeah, Farah’s lying out of his ass by making that claim. Again, not a surprise.

Left by Terry K. on June 21st, 2009

And don’t even get me started on the gerunds!
Make sure you put the boys and girls in separate cages, too!

Left by actor212 on June 23rd, 2009

We All Knew Her As “Nancy”

Bruce (Betty-Jo) Bialosky is founder of the “Republican Jewish Coalition of California,” (a position which offers slightly less opportunity for human interaction than the job of Major Appliance Repair Specialist for the Maytag Corporation), as well as a columnist for Townhall; and it’s in the latter capacity that he has a specialmessage for President Obama:

Oh, I’m sorry, that’s not the message.  The actual message reads, “Psyche!”

Mr. Obama, your speech in Cairo encouraged me to reconsider my thoughts on how I view Islam as a religion in today’s society. I have really thought it over and decided to fully accept Islam … with just a few caveats.

Betty-Jo is one of the Caveat Creeps!

First, they have to stop treating women as second class citizens.

Except when it comes to abortion — we’re actually kind of on-board with that part of the program.  And the staying home and raising children, and submitting to her husband, and…  Okay, look.  Basically, we demand that women in Muslim countries be treated as second class citizens with the option to buy an upgrade to first class if they’re light-skinned and rich enough.

Don’t tell me those head covers are worn by choice. They are forced on them just like honor killings.

Well now I feel bad for all those Orthodox Jewish women I pass on my way to the New Beverly Cinema.  I always assumed the scarves and snoods were consensual.

Halacha (Jewish law) requires married women to cover their hair…

It is sad the French have it right and we don’t on this issue. This is a country where we have worked for a hundred years to bring equality to women.

Just give us another couple hundred more and I’m sure we’ll nail it.

Allowing any woman to be subservient is disgraceful.

Couldn’t agree more.  Still, we better check the directions first…

Corinthians 11:  Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head—it is just as though her head were shaved. If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head. A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. For this reason, and because of the angels, the woman ought to have a sign of authority on her head.

So come on, ladies, we’re at war — dishonor your head!

And come to think of it, tell your Secretary of State and Speaker of the House to stop covering their heads on visits. They are supposed to be beacons of the women’s movement. By covering their heads, they are not being respectful to their hosts– they are disgracing every woman who ever fought for equal rights.

Don’t mind me, hum-de-dum, just disgracing my sex, la-la-la…

Next, tell the Islamists to stop killing gays. Maybe gays are not totally accepted in this society, but we have made great progress in the last 50 years. We may not agree on gay marriage, but we certainly agree on equal rights for gays.

“…in that we agree they shouldn’t have any…Okay, I admit, that’s another point for the Islamists, but even a stopped clock is right twice a day.”

We don’t allow them to be killed just for being gay.

They’ve got to be gay and do something offensive, like cruise Tucker Carlson in a public toilet.  Then it’s on, bitch!

How about the issue of freely elected democratic governments in the Muslim world? Not too many of those around, are there Mr. Obama? When the Islamic world stops being run like feudal societies given up by the rest of the world half a millennium ago, I think it would then be a grand time to accept the Muslims.

(Offer void in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, and Qatar.)

I know it is sometimes politically expedient to deal with dictators…But please explain to me why in today’s world, where the great majority of people live in democracies, that we need to make nice-nice with dictators. This country is all about not accepting autocracies, Mr. Obama.

Just their tongues.

Posted by scott on June 15th, 2009

Maybe We Can Put The Shah’s Corpse In Charge. It Worked Great The First Time Posted by scott on June 15th, 2009

John Hawkins of Right Wing News thinks Republicans should insist on the ouster of Leon Panetta, claiming the CIA Director stepped irrecoverably and unforgivably beyond the bounds of civility when he joked about Alex Rodriguez impregnatingDick Cheney, which is certainly a fair point.  But then, in a remark so off the top of his head it’s practically a form of self-trepanation, he adds:

Meanwhile, people across the world are looking to Iran and scratching their heads, wondering if the CIA has done anything to help the people.

Eric Cantor excoriated the Obama Administration for their low-key response, but only John Hawkins had a sufficient grasp of international relations to stand up for the Special Relationship between Iran and the CIA.

Posted by scott on June 15th, 2009