The World O' Crap Archive

Welcome to the Collected World O' Crap, a comprehensive library of posts from the original Salon Blog, and our successor site, world-o-crap.com (2006 to 2010).

Current posts can be found here.

Sunday, August 21, 2011

Dude Ranch Looks Like A Lady

I’m probably not qualified to blog against sexism, as witnessed by the fact that I only just noticed that it’s Blog Against Sexism Day.  But I think I can get a post in just under the wire, by virtue of the fact that I live on the west coast, and it’s not even 10:00 PM here yet, and because I’m a man, and everybody knows we’re natural procrastinators and are used to cutting us some slack.

Anyway, by a strange coincidence, I was corresponding today with Dan Domike, proprietor of Jackson Street Books, who has been kind enough to stock copies of Better Living Through Bad Movies, and he casually mentioned his own familial connection to the dream factory:
I grew up in LA, mostly in the Valley before it was the Valley (moved there in 1959) and had lots of ranches and fruit groves. Didn’t get to Hollywood alot, unless to see a movie or visit my older cousin (technically my first cousin thrice removed) who did female leads before talkies and ended up doing screenplays for Republic. She lived in a residential hotel on Highland. Great gal.
Even more strangely, I was talking to Mary last night about just how few women screenwriters I bump into in the course of daily business.  And how it only recently dawned on me what a peculiar state of affairs this is, given that the dramatis personae of your typical pitch meeting (at least, in my limited experience) invariably comprises one or two male writers peddling their wares to a phalanx of female development executives.  And yet, in the early years of the motion picture business, when roles were far more fluid, women screenwriters and even directors were surprisingly common:
Before the film industry became a big business, women were involved in nearly every aspect of production. Writer Lizzie Francke has quoted screenwriter Beulah Marie Dix (1898-1973) on this point: “It was all very informal, in those early days. There were no unions. Anybody on the set did anything he or she was called upon to do. I’ve walked on as an extra, I’ve tended lights (I’ve never shifted scenery) and anybody not doing anything else wrote down the director’s notes on the script . . . I also spent a good deal of time in the cutting room.” As Francke remarked, “In such a relatively egalitarian atmosphere women seemed destined to become equal partners with men in this new industry.” The Library holds films created by many of these pioneering filmmakers, including works by Gene Gauntier (1891-1966), Helen Gardner (1885-1968), Mabel Normand (1894-1930), Cleo Madison (1883-1964), Grace Cunard (1893-1967), Julia Crawford Ivers (d. 1930), Ruth Ann Baldwin, and Dorothy Davenport Reid (1895-1977).
The first person believed to have directed a narrative film is Alice Guy (later known as Guy-Blaché, 1873-1968). In 1896, Guy was secretary to Léon Gaumont, whose French photography company was expanding to include the sale of a motion picture camera. Guy asked permission to make a story film to demonstrate the new device. Gaumont agreed, but only if the project did not interfere with her secretarial duties. Within a year, Guy was head of Gaumont film production; and by the time of her emigration to the United States in 1907, she had produced (often directing) about 400 short films.
In America, she formed her own film studio, Solax (1910-14), where, as president and chief director, she supervised the production of more than 300 movies. In 1913, Guy concentrated on making longer films, eventually directing 22 feature films. 
Before embarking on a film career, Lois Weber (1882?-1939) had already toured as a child prodigy concert pianist, worked as a missionary in Pittsburgh, and appeared on the stage. In 1908, she joined the Gaumont studio in New York City, where she wrote, directed, and acted in motion pictures. Weber eventually moved to Hollywood, where she became Universal Studio’s highest-paid director in 1916. In 1917, she formed her own production company and continued to make films that reflected her moral stand on important social issues. She had addressed birth control and abortion in Where Are My Children? (1916), capital punishment in The People vs. Joe Doe (1916), and drug addiction in Hop, the Devil’s Brew (1916).
In recent years, some of these forgotten female artists have begun to emerge from obscurity.  A documentary entitled Without Lying Down, adapted from the biography by Cari Beauchamp recounts the life and career of Frances Marion, who was the go-to scribe for Mary Pickford, another woman who towered over the formative years of the film industry:
From 1915 to 1939, Frances Marion was one of the most powerful talents in the movie industry, writing more than 200 movies as the world’s highest paid screenwriter, man or woman, and becoming the first screenwriter to win two Oscars. Moguls competed for her stories, and stars like Pickford, Garbo, and Gable brought her characters to life in classics like “The Champ,” “Poor Little Rich Girl,” “Anna Christie,” “Camille,” and more.
June Mathis, like Dan’s cousin, began her career as an actress, before becoming one of the most influential women in Hollywood.  Famous in the 1920s as the only female executive at MGM, she’s best remembered today as the woman who discovered Rudolph Valentino, and wrote the picture, Four Horseman of the Apocalypse, that made him a star.

I asked Dan for a little more information about the family scribe, and he wrote back:
Her name was Betty Burbridge, or Elizabeth Burbridge. She was my grandmother’s first cousin, and about the same age. She was more like a granny to us than a cousin. She never married. She is listed for both screen appearances and screenplays at IMDB. She did a number of the Three Meesketeer films. She always told me that the films were not particularyl good, but, hey, it was the Depression and it was a living.
According to the IMDB, which is far from flawless or exhaustive, Cousin Betty’s acting career stretched from Slim Turns the Tables in 1913 (one of at least 9 Slim Films) to Charity? in 1916 (although there’s evidence she may have appeared on Broadway in 1919, co-starring in a comedy called Five O’Clock that ran for 41 performances at the Fulton — later the Helen Hayes Theatre).  It appears that Betty embarked on her career as a scenarist the following year, since her first recorded writing gig is a story credit on the 1917 picture, The Brand of Hate.

One of the most remarkable things about Betty is that she specialized almost exclusively in that most masculine of genres, the western.  As Dan mentioned, she scripted a number of the Three Mesquiteers pictures in the late 30s that starred John Wayne, Ray “Crash” Corrigan, and Raymond Hatton, as well as several entries in the Cisco Kid series.  And she wrote a staggering number of of Gene Autry’s films, beginning with Melody Trail in 1935, and continuing right through to her final credit, a 1952 episode of the Gene Autry television program.

Like most writers who toiled on the studio lots, from the opulence of MGM to the Poverty Row squalor of Republic Pictures, Elizabeth Burbridge was an invisible part of the machine, and we don’t have any glamour shots, press releases, or scandalous gossip column clippings to help to reconstruct her life.  But judging by her resume (which includes only those films for which she received screen credit — there’s really no telling how many scripts she may have worked on for a week here or a few days there) she was a creative force behind over a hundred motion pictures, stretching from the days of silent two-reelers cranked out in Nickleodeons to the dawn of television.  And there’s a good chance that at some point, most of us have unknowingly experienced her work, if only a few minutes of Springtime in the Rockies (original screenplay by Betty Burbridge) drowsily viewed at three in the morning on TCM.

Not exactly an Ozymandias-sized footprint, but enough to say, Look on my works, ye mighty/And crack a smile.

When I told Dan I wanted to write something about his cousin, he sent me a few more remembrances:
Funny thing about Cousin Betty was that we called her Tommie, her family name. The story is that her father wanted a boy, she disappointed in being a girl, but was called by family members all her life, Tommie. Betty was her professional name.
My grandmother, years ago, was vacationing in Mexico, (this would have been in the late sixties) when she saw John Wayne at a restaurant, having dinner with his wife. My grannie introuduced herself to the Duke, saying “You wouldn’t remember me, we met at a party years ago, but you would remember my cousin, Betty Burbridge”. And of course he did remember and was very gracious to my grandmother and asked her to say hello to my cousin. He may have been an old fascist, but I will think well of him because of his courtesy.
Very interesting post, Scott. I hour procrastination is forgiven on points.
And in English, that last line is “I hope your procrastination….”
I take contractions to the extreme.
So. Fucking. Jealous.
Not just of the careers and the women highlighted here, but of the article/post itself.
*sigh*
And sooooo proud that I went to film school. In Louisiana. Three screenplays and not a whit of progress from any of ‘em. Whadda shock, eh.
Well-done tribute, Scott. Very thoughtful, very interesting, and an enjoyable read.
Dan & Tammy get more interesting every day, don’t they?
(And hell yes, I’m jealous of the bookstores, too.)
Well, I’m not jealous of any of these women, because they’re all, you know, dead
Woo hoo! I didn’t think I could pan any sparkly, sparkly nuggets of snark outta that post, but I did it!!1! Huzzah!!
And, honestly, those women’s lives were far more exciting (mostly in good ways) than mine could ever be, and had the bonus of being pioneering, too.
The rather large numbers of female producers today traces from a second wave of women who came to prominence in the ’70s and ’80s, like the late Deborah Hill, many of them currently in television. Go ladies!
I love stories like these, mainly because I’m a movie geek. Procrastination is to be forgiven; you can’t rush quality.

And the Ann Coulter Tran–er Train Just Keeps On Derailing

As reported by BGay.com, the major advertisers on her website have dropped her, thanks to her latest screech for attention:
Net Bank, Verizon, Washington Mutual, AT&T/Cingular, Dollar Rent-A-Car, SmileTrain.org, University of Phoenix, Sallie Mae, LasikPlus, Power Chord Academy, Gulf Shores.com/Alabama Gulf Coast Convention and Visitors Bureau, Ulta.com, and Yellow Pages.com have now all stopped advertising at Coulter’s web site.
Personally, I think ULTA, a cosmetics store, was just looking for a reason-any reason-to drop her without telling her the truth: “Ann, you’re uglier than Michael Chertoff. And even OUR products can’t help you.”

It’s worse than that; Ann might make Ulta products look like clown makeup. They’ve doubtlessly paid her a large sum to say she uses Esteé Lauder or Cliniqué or something. Or whatever that brand of makeup is that morticians slather the corpses with to give them that “life-like” appearance.
An appropriate analogy, Marq — I’ve seen corpses that DID look more “lifelike” than mAnn Coulter. Hell, I’ve seen full-grown 300-lb. men with MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF FACIAL HAIR who looked more “feminine” than that freakazoid transplant-reject.
Personally, I find it horrifying that any company other than Murdoch hisself would advertise on Shim’s site — who in the hell is their target audience?!??! Serial Killers, 18-40, Who Eat Live Kittens When Given A Preference?!??!?!!
We iz a nation of hoooo-ahhhs. Well, the corporate interests who really run this country are giant flaming hoooo-ahhhs, but we already knew that.
Although, to judge by St. Ann Of The Codpiece’s tension level, I’d wager that Shim has neither toolage nor orfices (orifii?) with which to practice REAL prostitution (if ever I’ve seen an incomplete/unsuccessful transsexual operation!), so what we see is all that Shim can do.
Tsk.
Ain’t karma a bitch?

Top Chef

Somehow, Roy takes the following ingredients:  Fox’s new “comedy” news program, David Frum, Robespierre, and Wild Hogs, and says all that need ever be said about the difference between art and propaganda.  A feat not unlike pulling a dead woodchuck out from under the sun porch, throwing it onto the George Forman Indoor Grill, seasoning the bloated carcass with a sprinkle of aquarium gravel, adding a splash of turprentine, a pinch of Fresh Step, garnishing with a peach pit and a used head gasket, and somehow winding up with Chateaubriand.

Go.  Read.  Be amazed.

Ew. I just threw up in my mouth a little… but, I was still mulling over the whole sordid “Corp. Sanchez” thing.
I hope you’ll find room in the next edition of ‘Better Living’ for a few favourite road-kill recipes.

And Introducing Maryc

Well, actually, most of you already know her through the comments here at Wo’C.   And while s.z. fights a Thermopylae-like battle against the 14 dogs and cats currently occupying her house, Mary will be dropping in from time to time with snacks, cocktails, and cat pictures.

Way, way cool. Congrats, maryc, now make with the cat pics. ;-)
Yaaaay! Work I don’t have to do!
Yay for Maryc and welcome!
So where is she? Where are the pics? I keep telling you people: deadlines!
Cat pix! We need cat pix! My cats have been complaining about the recent dearth of cat blogging, and only hiss at Thursday Basset Blogging. Maryc, they’re purring in anticipation…
Hey, though. There’s a cat on my blog! Admittedly it’s from last Friday, and admittedly the picture itself is several years old, but… Um, I may even have a url around here somewhere.
http://hdsidhe.blogspot.com/
Also, there’s a frog in the photo. Don’t worry, nobody gets eaten. The cat in question assures you it’s perfectly fine to goo look at the cat pic and then click away without reading anything else. I’m cool with it, too.
Some of us have no cats at all. Don’t forget them, I mean us.
Maybe it’s the layout on my screen, but the word “dropping” appears directly under the words “14 dogs and cats” so at first glance I thought this was going to be a very different kind of post, a darker one involving bleach, rags, and cursing under one’s breath.
Congrats, MaryC!

Corporal Sanchez, Meet Major Rod

Okay, which of these two people has an “11 inch, uncut monster”?

It’s kind of a trick question, because almost certainly they both do.  But only one of them was born with it.  Probably the guy on the left, Corporal Matt Sanchez, USMC.  And as we learn from the blog Joemygod:
If you are familiar with Cpl. Matt Sanchez, you probably know him as the handsome 36-year old Columbia University junior and USMC reservist who recently made the rounds of right-wing talk shows like O’Reilly Factor and Hannity & Colmes, where he received praise for coming forward and complaining about his treatment at the hands of Columbia’s “radical anti-military students” who called him names and mocked his military service. Sanchez was then feted at the CPAC conference where Ann Coulter made her “faggot” remark. Sanchez wrote an op-ed piece on the Columbia experience for the NY Post…
Now, if you’re like me, you might think, “Hmm, 36 years old and he’s a junior in college and only a corporal in the Marines?” Odd, but not totally implausible. But Sanchez’ face tinkled a few gay bells out there in fairyland, and last night I began to get emails letting me know that his rather late appearance on the Ivy League scene was because Sanchez has had a lengthy career in gay porn, working under the names Rod Majors (NSFW) and Pierre LaBranche
The op-ed was cross-posted on Rod’s Matt’s blog, along with a clip of his appearance on the O’Reilly Factor.  He also appeared on Hannity and Colmes, where Sean contrasted Matt with troop haters like John Kerry and Charlie Rangel.  “You’re a great American,” Sean huskily intoned as he wrapped up the segment.  “Semper Fi, my friend."

But is that really a fair comparison, given that both Senator Kerry and Congressman Rangel are decorated combat veterans, while Matt has apparently never actually seen action.  Well, scoff if you like, but I like to think that Sean would be the first to point out that, unlike Cpl Sanchez, Kerry and Rangel have never seen hot man-on-man action in such celebrated video sex romps as Touched By An Anal, Lunch Hour 2: Sweating Grease, Tiajuana Toilet Tramps, and of course, Patriot Ass.

Even thought Cpl. Sanchez has evidently not yet been deployed to Iraq, it’s nice to see that the Pentagon is finally facing up to its chronic manpower shortages, and easing up on their recruiting standards.  And while it’s not perfect, I believe that all reasonable people who are serious about fighting the War on Terror can support this new policy:

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, But Feel Free To Tape Me Teabagging Joe Spears in Manticipation.
Now I’m going to leave you, secure in the knowledge that I did not succumb to the almost unbearable temptation to make a Dirty Sanchez crack.

Damn, he *does* look familiar.
Now, I would suggest that doing gay porn does not necessarily make one a faggot, but I would also suggest that Ann Coulter wouldn’t be able to see that distinction. Someone should ask her about this so she can pretend to be all betrayed and attempt to display other human emotions that a preying mantis such as herself would have to have been practicing for years. (And, really, I still have no idea why she’s so opposed to gays considering she just *screams* faghag. One almost assumes that she’s engaged in it as a cynical act of bullying. It’s very nearly like discovering that various virulently homophobic religious types have been “laying hands” on boywhores. But that would be a thoroughly incivil suggestion on my part.)
In 2001 the Chicago Bears–a .500 team at best for the previous decade–went 13-3. I have an in-law from Chi-town who was next to insufferable about it. I tried to be nice about it, but eventually I had to start pointing out the weakness of the division and the incredible string of games won because a fumble bounced up into a defender’s arms for an untouched runback or some such. I think they were something like +65 in takeaways that year. And of course as soon as I got snippy about it they peeled off three or four 20-point wins to end the regular season.
Then they lost their first playoff game, but the real point is that they went back to being mediocre (worse; 4-12) the next year.
The Coulter Party is just like that, except it being politics the seasons last a decade or two. Everything went their way so long they imagined it was due to superior intellect and divine intervention. Now you can’t swing a cat on the FAUX set without hitting an embarrassment waiting to happen. Bush hit the trifecta, remember? Now he’s the guy the remaining ’62 Mets look at and say, “Oh well, it could have been worse.”
And by the way, I’ve got a couple of ex-Marine buddies, and if some jock-sniffer like Hannity says “Semper Fi” to them he’d better be the son of a Bronze Star recipient who can prove he was born with severe spina bifida and applied to the Corps three times anyway.
Doesn’t faux do background checks on these people?
See? Just because you’re a cocksucker doesn’t mean that you’re gay! Ask Ted Haggard! Chances are the VRWC won’t see fit to address this in any way whatsoevah, bit if they do, the thing that will prove to have been steaming their shorts is that he was an all-male cast adult film star, not that he lied about being in the Marines. Feh.
Hmm. Upon further reading, it seems that Mr. Sanchez is probably actually in the service… for now! And, he was quoted as saying that he had a full-time job that was presumably not being a pr0n star or a man ‘ho. So, what, I wonder, is that?
Now I would have bet that it was the person on the right that had the 11 incher. But of course there’s only one way to know for sure, and that’s the old Crocodile Dundee grab test. Which if somebody is willing to go up to Coulter and do that, and post the video on youTube, I’ll pay them five bucks cold hard cash.
“Teabagging”??? I don’t even want to KNOW what that is. I thought I was worldly when I found out what a “golden shower” was. Hey, I’ll match edward’s $5.
OK, here’s my pledge of $5. Maybe we should have a telethon.
doghouse beat me to it. if that chickenhawk said “semper-fi” to my bro-in-law, he’d be spitting out teeth. Hell, I’m just an ex squid and I’d punch the mother fucker.
That IS Rod Majors. Or if it’s not, it’s his long-lost twin. Majors had a prolific and high-profile career in gay porn in the early-to-mid-90s. I actually OWN one of his movies, “Idol Country”, a major release in 1994 directed by Chi Chi LaRue (the queen of gay porn) and starring then-big-ticket-item Ryan Idol. He also worked with Falcon Studios, I’m pretty sure, so it’s not like he was in bargain-basement stuff.
But I wouldn’t call him 11″. 9″, sure, but not 11.
Hell Id put in 10 bucks to see her bagged..too funny.
and 9″ or 11″..doesnt matter at a certain point yanno?
9 or 11? Are we talkin’ dick size, or I.Q.?
Ahem: BeginningToWonder, teabagging involves dangling one’s nutsack out for one’s partner (or Joe Momentum, assuming one’s in the white house) to have oral fun with.
Well thanks, heydave! Whew, that’s a relief – I thought it might involve….well, never mind what I thought. That’s one of the great things about WOC – so educational!
Also, in prankstering, teabagging can be used to set up some LOVELY photos, generally on the faces of passed-out-drunk/comatose/etc. compadres — the roomful of guys whips out their sacks and lays ‘em on the unconscious guy’s face. Very popular at Fark.
Now, I gotta tellya, if we’re talking dick size, I’d wager that mAnn’s is bigger than JimmyJeffGannonGuckert, JUNIOR’s, but only by microns. If we hadn’t already heard testimony to the contrary, I’d wager that we were dealing with centimeters instead of inches. That shit-eating grin on “Corporal” Sanchez’s face is the giveaway. So to speak.
So, how do we confirm his “military status,” anyway? The folks at Jesus’ General do it sometimes, but I can never remember who did it or how they did it. Personally, anybody who can stomach Sean Hannity’s slut-sucking “Semper Fi” cannot be THAT far into the military, if y’all will pardon a horrid visual pun.
And yes, if y’all can front the gas money (a new compressor for my dead a/c unit wouldn’t hurt, either), me & the pickup will happily head to whichever cave mAnn hangs from by Shim’s talons in the daylight hours and do the aforementioned package-grab. Hell, we’ve all been wondering for YEARS now, might as well get it over with, as Shim descends into the bottomless abyss of The Surreal Life-style has-beendom. If you’re on your way out, might as well go out in FLAMES!!!
And yes, y’all should include a vat o’clorox with that gas money — I’m going to need the full-body detox after touching THAT.
Well, true, true.
Regardless of whether Corp. Sanchez’s dick or Ann’s suspiciously erectable “enlarged clitoris” is longer, I can testify to the fact that Corp. Sanchez’s unit is purty, while I suspect that AC’s is… warty.
Waaaaarrrty.
And wrinkly. And blotchy. And smegma-encrusted.
There, Annti. Saved you a trip. Enjoy your Chlor0x scrubdown!
Marq, I’m going to have to dispatch the ninja Mormons on your ass, one of these days.
Shame, boy. SHAME.
Fuck the clorox, bring on the flamethrowers!!!
BTW, not to be TOO too superficial here, pedantic maybe, am I the only one who noticed that mAnn had a boob job?
Those weren’t there the last time we glanced upon the horrible, horrible wonderment.
Well, they were there, but there sure as hell wasn’t that much there, there!!!
Any pretense of “sexiness” her new, improved teats give Ann is more than offset in that pic by the fact that you can count her many, many ribs. It has that delightful “concentration camp survivor” look to it. It’s no wonder Ann usually wears black-it’s so slimming! Eccchh!
They are the same person.
Nice to know that he wasn’t too adverse to those lefty types so long as they could afford his price tag and presumably fund his G.I. Joe reinvention.
Boob job? I wouldn’t know…I rarely look directly at Ann, as I don’t want my remaining sighted eye to go blind.*
*I’ve been blind in my left eye since birth. My left eye is my “lucky eye” when viewing La Coulter.
Ot: FORCE CONGRESS TO IMPEACH, Call Nancy Pelosi @1-202-225-0100 and DEMAND IMPEACHMENT. DC business hours only, call often, and spread it around.
‘don’t know about you, but I’d do either one of ‘em… Some very impressive looks there and some impressive statistics. …and I don’t care if Ann is real or not, she is hot!

When Ann Coulter Was Just A Twink In Her Father’s Eye

Marq in the comments below had this to say about Ann’s latest effort to squeeze yet another
“Oh No She DI-uhn’t” from an increasingly blasé constituency:
For someone who exists on a diet of outrage provoked in others, she’s reached that unfortunate point of rapidly diminishing returns. L’il Awrful Annie will have to reach deeper and deeper into her bucket of muck, searching for some horridly vile term with which to insult people…

After all, pointing and yelling, “Faggot!” isn’t all that dangerous. Gays are still a relatively safe minority to mock. A handful of newspapers will end up dropping her “column,” because *this* of all things will finally clue them in to the fact that mAnn’s a hatemonger (!). So, maybe she’ll progress to calling Governor Richardson a “spic,” or barak Obama the “n”-word. One can only hope.
Well, that’s how Ann keeps her wraith-like, cocktail dress-friendly figure, since the Outrage Diet is low in saturated fat (she’s both The Scarecrow and Mrs. King!).  And Marq is exactly right; because “faggot” is still a relatively safe slur in much of the country (and almost a form of punctuation in the average junior high school), Ann’s use of the term will not only slip past without consequences, it will ensure that of the many tedious and tendentious speeches issued at the Conservative Political Action Conference, hers are the only words that will be remembered.

But Marq is also right that Ann may find the Law of Diminishing Returns a bit tougher to flout than, say, the statutes governing voting and registration in Palm Beach County, Florida.  She can get away with calling Al Gore “a total fag,” as she did, per Media Matters, on the July 27 edition of Hardball.  But raising the rhetorical ante any further will require a bit more finesse than she’s displayed thus far.  I don’t believe she can get away with simply calling Barack Obama the N-word, even though that loathsome animadversion also remains in far wider circulation than we care to admit.  Instead, I predict she’ll use her patented technique of deploying a racial slur, then accusing the offended parties of racism, and immediately scrambling for the high ground at Golgotha:
I do want to point out one thing that has been driving me crazy with the media, how they keep describing Mitt Romney’s position as being “pro-gays, and that’s going to upset right-wingers.” Well, you know, screw you, I’m not anti-gay. We’re against gay marriage. I don’t want gays to be discriminated against. I mean, I think we have, in addition to blacks, I don’t know why all gays aren’t Republicans.
It’s almost like these nancy-boys can’t figure out who their real friends are.  Stupid knob-gobblers.
I think we have the pro-gay position, which is anti-crime and for tax cuts. Gays make a lot of money, and they’re victims of crime.
…primarily commited by the kind of people who vote Republican.  But thanks to our tax cuts, they’ll still have plenty of money left over to pay for reconstructive surgery and physical therapy after we eliminate same-sex domestic partner benefits like health insurance

And blacks, as Ann never tires of declaiming, should join the GOP to escape the condescending racism of the Democratic Party.  So when the exigencies of the marketplace finally require her to kick it up a notch, she’ll find some way to eat her cake and call someone a nigger, too.  “Can you imagine Barack Obama as Vice President to Hillary?  They’d treat him like he was the ‘house nigger’ on a plantation, dress him up in a butler suit, call him ‘Uncle Barack,’ and let him answer the front door.”

There would follow the usual expressions of outrage from the left blogosphere, defensive protestations that it was just “a joke!” from Ann and her supporters, and more TV appearances the next time she has a book to flack.  But even though there are still a few sensitivities she has yet to trample, I can’t help feeling that Ann has already hit the wall, in much the same way Bill O’Reilly and even Rush Limbaugh has.  They’re not growing concerns, they’re providers of a niche fetish.  And within their niche, they all do quite well.  As do the makers of German schwanger and schiesse videos, but neither one of those seems poised to break out and become a nationwide craze like the hula-hoop.

There was a time when Limbaugh was inescapable; if he wasn’t on the radio in every city he was on TV, either his own syndicated show, or some ostensibly respectable network program. But now, as with Ann, I only remember he exists when he says something unusually stupid. They all have a dedicated fanbase, but that audience is becoming more calcified and impermeable, encouraging their act to become ever more incestuous and Escheresque, until the whole experience for a potential newcomer is pretty much like trying to watch Lost by starting in the middle of the third season.

Or maybe we’re being too cynical. Perhaps there’s some deep-seated trauma in Ann’s past that compels her to act out like the Chris Cooper character in American Beauty. And indeed, a cursory investigation does indicate a common theme to Ann’s cries of “faggot!” In short, her belief that dead children turn you gay.
Edwards has talked about his son’s death in a 1996 car accident on “Good Morning America,” in dozens of profiles and in his new book. (“It was and is the most important fact of my life.”) His 1998 Senate campaign ads featured film footage of Edwards at a learning lab he founded in honor of his son, titled “The Wade Edwards Learning Lab.” He wears his son’s Outward Bound pin on his suit lapel. He was going to wear it on his sleeve, until someone suggested that might be a little too “on the nose.”
If you want points for not using your son’s death politically, don’t you have to take down all those “Ask me about my son’s death in a horrific car accident” bumper stickers? Edwards is like a politician who keeps announcing that he will not use his opponent’s criminal record for partisan political advantage. I absolutely refuse to mention the name of my dearly beloved and recently departed son killed horribly in a car accident, which affected me deeply, to score cheap political points.
Al Gore increased the stakes, becoming not only a faggot, because his son was injured in an accident, but “a total fag” when he added a dead sister to the mix:
Democrats can’t tell us their ideas until after the election. Instead, their version of a political campaign is to stage a “Queen for a Day” extravaganza — which has special resonance in the case of the Democrats.
Al Gore famously inaugurated the family tragedy routine at the 1992 Democratic National Convention, where his idea of an inspiring political speech was to recount the story of his son being hit by a car. At the 1996 convention, Gore told a tear-jerker about his sister’s long, painful death from lung cancer. It got to the point that Gore’s family members had to fear any more runs for higher office.
I haven’t heard of Ann calling Howard Dean a big tinsel-tied sachet of gaywad, but he too had the effrontery to be touched by a death in the family:
Howard Dean talks about his brother Charlie’s murder at the hands of North Vietnamese communists. Bizarrely, after working on the failed George McGovern campaign, Charlie Dean went to Indochina in 1974 to witness the ravages of the war he had opposed. Not long after he arrived, the apparently ungrateful communists captured and killed him. Hey fellas! I’m on your s– CLUNK!
Ann hasn’t yet clarified her position on whether having a dead child turns a woman into a lesbian, but you’ll recall that she’s had it up to here with weeping widows:
“I’ve never seen people enjoying their husbands’ deaths so much,” Coulter writes in her new book.
“These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by grief-arazzis,” Coulter writes.
“And by the way, how do we know their husbands weren’t planning to divorce these harpies? Now that their shelf life is dwindling, they’d better hurry up and appear in Playboy. . .
Hm.  Maybe I should fill out that subscription card.  Because while Time, NBC, CNN, and the rest of the MSM routinely fails me, Playboy is the one venue where I can be reasonably sure that I will never see Ann.  Unless they do a Girls of Snake Mountain issue…

Nice to have you back, Scott. Hope you’re feeling better.
It sounds like you’re feeling better, anyway.
Ann, honey, I think I know what “the pro-gay position” is, and the GOP ain’t close. The “gay pro” position they got, apparently, but only by the hour, and only when no one’s looking.
“bizzarly…went to witness the ravages of the war he had opposed”
In Ann Coulter’s world, seeing the ravages of war makes you pro-war.
It’s hard to imagine how she could get any nastier, and yet she always manages to be. Tho I thought her faggot comment rather lame. Boy, is she ugly! The sexy clothes and attitude only makes her look worse. Since Rupug guys like that, one can’t be surprized by Jeff Gannon.
Going by mAnn’s “dead child = teh ghey”-thing, wouldn’t that mean… that… Rick Santorum is a great, big pooftah‽‽‽” E-freaking-gads!! I did not want to know that.
P.S. As someone mentioned on Atrios, I believe, at the moment, there’s a lovely picture of mAnn up at the Huffington Post (circa March 3rd) as a shrieking harpy, though that incarnation really belongs to Atlas Pam.
My personal theory is that Anna Nicole Smith was Ann Coulter’s “Dorian Grey” body, and it had all the food, six, children and elderly, elderly men Ann would like to have, but doesn’t, due to ideological reasons. Why is Ann still alive, then? IT IS A MYSTERY!!1!
Not “six,” damn it–SEX! Sex, damn it! I saw it just as I hit the “Submit” button! Feh! Feh! FEH!!1!
Actually, I’m kinda surprised one could say “gays are safe to mock”, after the big blowup over that stupid Snickers commercial (which wasn’t even mocking gays in the first place). Maybe safer,, but…
ech anyway it begs the question, how does she get away with it at all. The mind boggles.
I’ve figured out what bothers me about that photo. Ann’s on the wrong side of the shark. To be fair, the shark shouldn’t even be in the picture anymore.
Ann Coulter was weaned on a sewer rat! Vile is too kind a word to describe her. She needs to go back to the sewers where she belongs.
[...] Original post by scott and software by Elliott Back   [...]
Coulter reminds me of a line from King Lear when Edgar is generally screwed six ways to Sunday and he says:
“the worst is not
So long as we can say ‘This is the worst.’
Of course, he is anticipating now getting screwed seven ways to Sunday.
Everytime I think Coulter can’t be more despicable, vile and loathsome, she outdoes herself. Isn’t there some kind of equivalent to Mr. Creosote so at some point she will literally explode from her own bile? She’ll go for that last vicious “wahffer-theen meent.” With luck she will be on Fox when it happens.
I know you’ll probably just make fun of me for saying this, but don’t you think all this talk about how Ann is really a man and that’s disgusting, trans people are disgusting, is also wrong? I wish you wouldn’t use it, there are so many other fine ways to insult her.
I hope Edwards makes boatloads of money off of:
“Ann Coulter’s Ugly Crack.”
OK, OK, the “mAnn Coulter” and “Adam’s Apple Annie” bits are – admittedly – cheap-ass cracks, and nearly beneath any thinking person…
…BUT…
[boy, am I gonna get in trouble for this]
…considering the trade AC deals in, literally ANY insult tossed her way is fine by me. And, yes, yea, I know that yelling, “Tranny, tranny!” isn’t any better than yelling, “Scat-nosed limpy-wristed fagwad!!1!”
OTOH, just who are the trans-whatever supposed to appeal to? On the rare, rare occasions in which they’ve looked enough like a woman to fool me (even in dim bar lighting), that totally turns me off. And when they look anywhere from a bit off to way-over-teh-top off, all that wig and makeup and rouge turn me off. Hell, even when I’ve run into an attractive, seemingly-masculine guy who turns out to be wearing women’s panties, it turns me off like a switch was thrown. So, who are these people trying to attract? Not me, since I’m looking for a head-to-toe guy (and, no, not one who turns out to have a clitoris). I assume the target varies by the person targeting, anything from closeted bisexuals to other cross-dressers. Many of the actual sex-change people, as opposed to the cross-dressers, might be looking for an ostensibly “straight” person of the newly-minted opposite sex.
BTW, currently, there’s a headline on CNN about the Coulter thing, and it says there’s controversy about her “gay smear.” WTF‽ Her intent wasn’t to smear gays… not that she likes gays, but she was trying to insult John Edwards. Why does CNN hat teh faghz‽!?‽
Well, I wouldn’t trash tans people. In fact, I once saw a female-to-male transsexual I found kinda hot, in a documentary Lee Grant directed that aired on cable a long time ago (can’t recall the title, or his name.)
I only question Ann’s gender because she says so many misogynistic things, it’s as if she’s unaware that she’s a woman. She doesn’t live up to the standards by which she judges other women, and appears to wish she were “one of the guys”.
And honestly-she DOES look kinda like a drag queen, except real drag queens have more class-and fewer issues. Plus, a real drag queen could kick her ass.
Um…”TRANS people”, not “tans people”, though I wouldn’t trash them either.
Marq,
There are in this world folks who are into dudes who look like ladies. Just…google. It’s a bit unsettling to contemplate at first, but hey, that’s what makes the world go ’round, I suppose. I used to live in Florida and, for a time, dated a girl from Key West. We went down there for some festival or another, and walking around, I saw all these drop-dead gorgeous women. My ladyfriend would point out a particularly stunning one and say, “That’s a guy.” No way, I’d say, but lo and behold, we’d get a little bit closer and, sure enough, dude looks like a lady.
I am a big dumbass country boy and don’t know from things like that. Back then – almost 10 years ago – I knew even less. It was indeed a revelation on a number of levels, particularly trying to wrap my mind around some cat taping up his boys so there’s no unsightly bulge whilest wearing his thong. Apparently, that just spoils the whole thing.
And for whatever it’s worth, I don’t think calling Coulter a “trans” in any sort of combination of words is a nice thing to do. In my mind, it’s basically saying, “Hey, you suck because you’re just like Group X, all of whom suck without question.” Got nothing to do with Coulter, but I’d hate to think some basically decent transexual or transvestive thought I hated his/her guts because he/she heard me compare him/her to Ann Coulter.
It’s just not a nice thing to do, so I don’t do it, but that’s just me. I realize politics is a dirty game and I realize someone as vile and asreprehensible and, frankly, as useless as human being as Coulter is doesn’t deserve a modicum of respect, even the barest of civility (which isn’t even directed at her). But I’m not Ann Coulter and, frankly, I see that as a bonus.
That’s just me, though. I don’t presume beyond that.
Mahn Dearie,
YAWN! Ho-hum. Snore. Snooze.
Her “wit” is on a par with an audience member from the Rush Limbaugh teevee show – arid, tired, flacid and CANCELED.
Expecting Republicans to be trapped in the bait n switch they’ve created for our side is not going to happen. These dicks do fake moral outrage well because they own the media.
When the Dems try to get some signs of decency and accountability out of these America fucking perps, they sound like Olive Oyls’ pappy wandering round the house droning, “you owe me an apology.”
Don’t hold your breath waiting for their rules to apply to them. They’re only meant to apply to us.
It’s way past time for a change in that losing dynamic.
Another stroke…
I do know a couple female-to-male transsexuals, though I’ve never been able to figure out a way to ask them about it that I was comfortable with. There is, to my mind anyway, a strikingly large number of them in/from Athens. I am curious as to the whys, but beyond the general “Hey, that’s what they wanna do, it makes ‘em happy, which makes me happy and beyond that, it’s none of my damn business”, I find it difficult to wrap my head around the concept.
In college, I had my first experiences with lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transvestites, transsexuals, polyamorists and all mannerisms of romantic travelers. As I said, I’m a dumbass country boy from rural Misssissippi, and we just don’t have such things there, not out in public anyway. It all fascinated me and I asked a lot of people questions about why they did what they did, how they felt about it and how they felt about how society viewed them. I realize now that in my big dumbass (but well-intentioned) country boy way, I was sometimes less-than-respectful of people in my questioning, and I wish to avoid that with my friends who’ve decided that they’d rather be men than women. It’s just a general curiosity, ’cause that’s what I do, wonder about things. In any event, my friends make their choices and when their choices make them happy, that’s all I care about. What I don’t understand don’t matter, really.
There is one thing, though. Two of ‘em have hit on me, and both were post-female. One of ‘em was pretty overt, flat out asking if I wanted to go home with him. I have to admit, the proposition resulted into a crashing derailment to my train of thought that my body language failed miserably to hide. My friend, however, was cool with it and revealed that he’d had a crush on me since before he was a he.
That was something of a stunner, too, since he was a pretty heavy duty “openly dyke”* lesbian when he was a she. I look like Willie Nelson, circa the Red-Headed Stranger album. That don’t make no sense a’tall to me, but it is always nice to know someone actually would have sex with you when you’re as astoundingly unattractive as I am.
* Apologies to George Carlin.
Anna, I don’t know that anyone’s going to make fun of you. They shouldn’t. It’s a legitimate concern, and one that’s been addressed repeatedly here and elsewhere.

This is one of those things we do get into a lot. Myself, I’m schizophrenic. And personally, I think Dubya Bush is, too, among other toys in his attic. Of course, I know that schizophrenia is not some sort of character flaw: in the invaluable words of Leo the Lop, “Normal is what you are!” And I accept that Bush’s biggest problem is likely to be a completely different issue, like, you know, the fact that he’s an asshole. And it could be argued that schizophrenic people and the otherwise mentally ill have enough social stigma without trying to tie George Bush to them. In fact, I’ve argued that. But that doesn’t mean it’s automatically untrue.

The thing is, Coulter, like it or not, in addition to being an incredibly vicious person, does have obvious gender issues, the misogyny and ambiguous personal habits being the biggest ones for me.
I don’t personally like to go after her for her admittedly somewhat masculine appearance, but after the string of fag comments she’s known for, I’m not really willing to chew out those who do. And I don’t actually entirely think it’s fair to go after people for their appearance anyway, but Coulter has made any number of comments on other peoples’ appearances. Sauce for the goose, as they say.

I’m also aware that a number of women firmly believe that women shouldn’t have been allowed the vote, and that being a misogynist woman is not *necessarily* a pointer to gender identity issues.
Not to mention that who people date or sleep with is for the most part none of my business, except where Coulter has spent the last several years attempting to make it *everyone’s* business who other people date or sleep with.

I’m still further aware that you are not defending Coulter but pointing out that it’s an insult to the transgendered to be lumped with her, which is both fair and thoughtful and should be treated as a reasonable comment. Though it is also pretty funny, but I tend to find a lot of social stigmas funny while vehemently disputing the underlying stereotype, so I hope you’re not offended. But it doesn’t seem to me to be too likely that any of the regulars here will actively make fun of you for your comment, though some may be irritated at having to debate it again. That’s not your fault, nor really your problem, I don’t think.

My point here, which will be apparent to everybody who knows me, is that I haven’t got a clue how to resolve this debate. To be fair, I’ve seen this argument on literally dozens of blogs, and I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone make a case that created a consensus stance. I somewhat doubt anyone ever will, or that we’ll all develop a coherent position on whether calling Dubya crazy is an insult to the mentally ill, or calling people chickenhawks is wrong, or making fat jokes is inherently intolerant, or any of a million other occasions where genuinely sympathetic people sincerely feel that something is needlessly hurtful to any particular group that the original comment may not have focused on.

But at least we’re capable of having these discussions, and trying to see different points of view, and trying to determine if our attitudes could be more empathetic towards each other as humans. Which, incidentally, is what I’ve always defined as “being PC”–basic manners and attempts at genuine understanding. People like Coulter assume that it is a straightjacket we try to force on each other to make everyone conform. It’s not. It’s a handrail down the extremely steep and dark, cluttered stairs that is a diverse society.

It’s that lack of understanding that makes Coulter what she is, and that makes so many of us want to respond to her in kind. Turning the other cheek is hard enough, but when we start discussing how tolerant we have to be toward the intolerant, it can seem like nothing more than a trap.

On the off chance someone does make fun of you for your comments, which I hope they don’t, haven’t seen anyone do, and don’t think they will, that may be why.

I’m not a lot of help, am I?
OK, I admit it. My previous comment was throwing a grenade into a henhouse, as it were. Feathers were bound to be ruffled.
And, yes, I know perfectly well why different people are attracted to each other, even tranny grannies and fatty Mclardingtons; and it’s different strokes for dif-no, strike that. The reason is exactly the same in everyone: it’s because of the way we’re wired. And, yes, as Matt T. noted above, unless someone is putting on a heck of an acting job, body language nearly always gives the game away. In my life, I’ve learned two extremely useful things: 1.) Hitting on really, really straight guys is pretty damned useless. Even if they’re drunk.
2.) There are a lot of bisexual people.
A.
Lot.
Perhaps I’ll tone things down a little so as not to accidently insult a group I don’t intend to insult… like fatties. But, everyone, keep in mind that in future, any insults hurled Ann Coulter’s way are intended solely for Ann “herself.”
Ah, fuck!
Oh, and from my previous comment… “Why does CNN hat teh faghz‽!?‽” should have been “Why does CNN hate teh faghz‽!?‽” Correcting typos is a hobby of mine during teh winter months…
…and during the summer, too.
Woo! Between me, D. Sidhe, and Matt T., it’s Long Comment Night™ here at WO’C!!1! Wooooo!!1!!!1!eleventy-one!
Well Marq and Sildhe, as a feminist, I heart what you say. Might I add, that if you’re not part of the problem (that is self described progressive boys hurling epithets used traditionally against people they purport to defend) then, you needn’t apologize.
I’ve seen and participated in the worn out discussions on some femmy blogs about the coulter-sadly discussions. The same ole same ole. We needn’t dredge it all up here.
I also have to say that the initial post did very well at sticking to the issue and not denigrating into that shit bucket of privileged progressive boy misogyny – “I can say it cause I use it this way and not that way and you understand right?”
Just to add also that I understand about Coulter’s misogyny, but only a woman so wrapped up in patriarchal cellophane would not hear everyday, dripping from another woman’s mouth, misogyny that would make Rush boy proud. We feminists oft wonder ourselves and must pause to remember that it only indicates how far women have yet to come.
And please spare me about out getting the vote, I mean can we stop thanking men for that which they never really ‘gave’ us already?
damn it, typing on a laptop keyboard caused me to hit enter when I meant to edit.
[...] Tying it all together, you wonder?  Ann is on TV a lot.  But her schtick groweth old, and the lovely people at World O’ Crap put her problem succinctly. [...]
If you ask me, it seems that Ann suffers from a little something called “Serena Joy Syndrome”. Much like the fictional character in “The Handmaid’s Tale”, Ann is probably anti-women because it gives her power, attention, and pats on the back from the men on her side and all while believing that the rules she imposes on others will never apply to her. And when Serena’s side won, she lost everything she took for granted: her job, any independant accounts, and her freedom.
>> Actually, I’m kinda surprised one could say “gays are safe to mock”, after the big blowup over that stupid Snickers commercial (which wasn’t even mocking gays in the first place). Maybe safer,, but…
Gah, weird formatting. Sorry.
Actually, I’m kinda surprised one could say “gays are safe to mock”, after the big blowup over that stupid Snickers commercial (which wasn’t even mocking gays in the first place). Maybe safer,, but…
See, here’s the thing about that Snickers blowback. On the blogosphere, the big reaction was against the commercial for perceived homophobia. But in the real world, most of the complaints I was hearing came from people who were disgusted at them having allowed two men to kiss on-screen (and that includes the reactions of the football players they recorded and posted on the Snickers website). So it’s kind of hard to tell which crowd it was that really overreacted the most.
Yo, Marq, mi amigo, tread carefully. You wander the minefield, you can end up sauted. If I’ve learned anything in the last couple of days on the t00bz, it’s that the the right wing does not have exclusivity over the looney brigade.
Yonder there be monsters!!
mikey
Ann strikes me almost as a character from an H. P. Lovecraft story. As the years go on, she becomes crazier and crazier, eventually devolving into a gibbering maniac intent on preparing the world for the Old Ones’ return. The more press exposure she gets, the more she feels the need to be “outrageous”, continually upping the ante until she has no choice but to descend into howling obscurity.
Or at least, one can hope.
And while I admit that I snicker at the “mAnn” comments, none of the trans people I’ve met have ever been as socially maladjusted as Coulter. And most of them are prettier.
Well, now, of course, Republicans would never tout their families in campaigns, would they?
Surrrrrrrrrrrrrrre, Dick Cheney never talks about his (cue dancing card girls) LESBIAN DAUGHTER ever, of course?
No, of course not! Goodness knows Republicans would never trot out family for political points…
It’s an interesting gambit–you charge a politician with being a member of some group, and when you’re called on it, you say “Hey, I wasn’t bashing the group, I was bashing the politician!” Thus inviting your audience to overlook the fact that the comment about the politician can only be seen as “bashing” if the group you’ve lumped him in with is already scorned.
But the stranger aspect to this story is the venom toward Edwards and Gore for being survivors of family tragedies. Compare with her comments about World Trade Center widows, and the inescapable conclusion is that she’s prejudiced against the bereaved.
Is there even a name for that? Much less an explanation? Discuss amongst yourselves.
Well, trashfire, the only name for that I can come up with is ‘ASSHOLE’.
Here’s a present for s.z.: earlier today, for about a second, CNN ran a particularly “untalented transvestite”-looking pic of Ann. Yecch. Really captures the whole Coulter “look,” dunnit? Don’t know how long the link will work–if you *dare*!
…except, you can’t see her hands. Ah, well.
Matt T., I’ll bet you’re actually very cute. And articulate!
It also is a balm to one’s soul to find out that someone–someone, anyone!–finds you’re attractive. Some of the happiest moments in my twenties came when a few guys who’d been too shy to hit on me in high school finally did.
The idea of mAnn having sex with anyone, anything, makes me wince. Except for, perhaps, the Black & Decker portable power drill I have in the basement. The very idea of pimping a wild, sweet coupling between mAnn and the seldom-used drill here at Casa Biscuitbarrel makes me grin.
Hey, I live right here in Washington. Anything’s possible, right? Apart from interesting my fellow Biscuitbarrels in home repairs, that is?
Now, now. I’ve reconsidered: perhaps it is wrong of us mock Ann Coulter for her appearance. After all, she can’t help how she looks-it’s one the disadvantages of being the walking undead that she doesn’t cast a reflection. So let’s pity her, shall we?
My that picture of Anne brought back memories. Actually, nightmares of when I was hanging out with some pretty intense meth freaks back around 69. Walking dead, Bill S. Absolutely. But really wired walking dead. I sort of like that picture because it captures the utter vacancy of her soul. She looks so crazy in that picture, like she is just looking for a gerbil so she can gnaw on it’s head. Sorry, no pity.
not even for the gerbil?
Well, the gerbil, of course.
[...] World O Crap. Republicans, conservatives, let me ask: if she doesn’t speak for you, why is she still hired to speak to you? [...]
Elaine Boosler, standing in for Stephanie on The Stephanie Miller Show (radio) yesterday, proposed that from now on we all practice the phrase “Republican spokeswoman Ann Coulter.” Attach that descriptor to her name every time, and make them deny it.
Pleeeese! I’m so sick of seeing AC’s ugly face and chlorine hair when I check out your blog. Please put some kitty pics up! Or a picture of a toilet, or something…better.
… and another thing. Ms. Coulter has quite mannish features- that square jaw, adam’s apple, big square hands. But she wears a sexy black dress all the time, has dyed blond hair, and her ‘image’ is of a sex symbol. Therefore I think she is deserving of any and all ridicule, including being compared to a transvestite. Tho I can understand the transvestite being offended.
There’s something I’ve noticed recently, as Coulter has aged just a bit. She is a hick. Except for the blonde hair, she has the features of Daddy’s little Tobacco Road pump-puppet, complete with tits and ribs you can count. Photoshop her into some Tom Joad shit and you’ll see it. Her name is actually a dead giveaway (cp. Wendell Berry’s novel of 1940s redneckism in Kentucky, “Nathan Coulter” in which teachers are beaten for embarrassing “schoolkids” with hard questions).
Coulter’s face also appears (continually) about to break into heartrending “Shane”-like sobs. It’s in her eyes. When you Photoshop her into B&D suits, you energize her. But if you put her in a T-shirt with a Raggedy Ann in hand at the doorway of a trailer…her eyes are scanning the horizon for a Daddy who isn’t coming home.
Amen and amen again to D.Sidhe (as always), Marq, and especially Yaoi Huntress Earth.
But seeing the online nic which I adopted, lo, those many moons ago, I figure that I get to weigh in a bit, even at this late date.
To any and all whom I might have offended in all these years of demanding a recount on mAnn Coulter, St. Ann Of The Codpiece, et al, here’s how I feel about it: I wasn’t talking about YOU.
mAnn makes its/shim’s life’s “work” (that shim gets paid for such ignorance is a crime against shim’s beloved capitalism) by fomenting hatred, ignorance, violence, and all other things vastly wrong and evil. mAnn Coulter has not one original “thought” to foist upon the populace, not one actual concept beyond greed, hatred, etc., not one real true THING to offer the world. And of all of the human beings that shim likes to defame most, transsexuals/transgendered/homosexuals/bisexuals/etc. get it the worst. mAnn Coulter just absofuckinglutely LOVES to hurt people who’ve got it difficult enough in this lifetime and who’ve never done a fucking THING to shim, and frankly, if the 9/11 widows weren’t bad enough, to watch the way that shim slings around the word, “faggot” and so forth, to see how she refers to people of non-majority sexual identities as LESS THAN HUMAN ought to disgust every thinking person in this country.
You throw shit on people, you get shit back. Think of it as the Cliff’s Notes of Karma. I do not seek to defame drag queens, transsexuals, or anyone else of a non-majority sexuality (depending on who’s doing the counting) by calling mAnn Coulter out. And believe me, nothing would give me more joy than to OUT that asinine motherfucker, if we could just figure out what in the HELL that it IS. But to watch the way that this craven harpie shrieks about everybody ELSE’S sex lives (unless they’re republicunts and/or cath-o-licks, of course, ’cause no republicunts have EVER gotten kinky, fey, perverted, adulturous or anything else not dictated by the Old Testament, certainly!), well, Shim’s Askin’ For It.
I do not purport to suggest that we here are “doing gawd’s work” or “enforcing” instant karma on anyone, I merely suggest that how we treat mAnn Coulter seems, to me, a purely natural reaction to a singular creature of such unmittigated ignorance, gall, and undisguised hatred. You see something ugly/horrific, you make a horrified face. This is our natural reaction to that anorexic, Adam’s Appled nightmare. Which isn’t to say that we’re hereby condoning homophobia or any other forms of discrimination against people of non-hetero identities, certainly not.
We just absofuckinglutely LOATHE that monstrously ugly motherfucker, and we’re dying of curiosity to see what’s under the Grim Reaper’s hand-me-downs.