When Bad Poisons Are Made by the Sons of Good PeopleFrom the Moonie Times (as reported by the Moonie Wire Service):
What they didn't tell you, courtesy of the Seattle Times:
Reuters adds that he told his sister in an email that he "could now poison water supplies." And here's what the Seattle Times didn't tell you: Robert's father, venture capitolist Tom Alberg, is the past Chairman of the Discovery Institute, a group which, per an interesting article from the Seattle Weekly about the local media's ties to Seattle's corporate elites, "espouses--among other things--teaching creationism, forming militias, lowering environmental standards when corporate profits are threatened, and increasing the role of religion in politics." (In 1988, when the article was written, a local TV anchorwoman served on board along with Alberg and a former member of the Nixon cabinent and a former Republican senate candidate. Alberg was further described as a confidant of Seattle's mayor, Paul Schell.) Per the Discovery Institute's website, a couple of its major projects are "The Center for Science and Culture," which tries to get Intelligent Design taught in the schools, and the "Technology and Democracy Project," which seeks to free technology from "the burdens of undue government regulation." Tom Alberg is on the advisory board of the T&D project. Interestingly enough, several Moonie Times articles are featured on the Institute's homepage. And per The King County Journal, last year Tom Alberg was also on the committee which organized a Bush fund raiser at the mansion of cell phone billionaire Craig McCaw: "In all, 77 top-tier players in politics and business comprise the host committee and state Bush-Cheney campaign leaders." The event was expected to raise $1.4 million. So, when your father is a millionaire, a big Bush donor, on the board of a conservative/libertarian foundation, and a friend of the mayor, you get to to turn yourself in voluntarily to the authorities when you are found to be making a deadly poison and talking about using it in the water supply. And your father hires a public relations firm to tell everybody how well your family is cooperating with the investigation, and that you're not responsible for your actions. And the Washington Times never mentions your father, and begins its story with the information that you're autistic, had no political motivations for possessing ricin, and never planned to actually use it. Based on the web info about Robert (his web site follow-up to the "Wife Wanted" sign he hung in his window; his CD, selections of which have been included on various "Worst Music Ever" programs), I doubt that Robert is actually autistic, but believe he may well have Asperger Syndrome, a condition on the autism spectrum ("Because of their high degree of functionality and their naiveté, those with AS are often viewed as eccentric or odd"). And he may have developed other problems this past year, as his father's PR person indicated. But it will be interesting to see if he get the same treatment as another Washington state man, one Kenneth Olsen, who, per the Seattle Times, "said he was merely curious about the toxin," but "was sentenced to 13 years in prison last fall." 3:30:44 PM |
I am getting tired of all those conservative "Even if Bush had known of 9/11 ahead of time, there's nothing he could have done differently, thanks to the Democrats, who would have whined about racism if he had shot all the Arabs" columns. So, I'm going to take it out on young Judson Cox, because his is the third of these I've read in the past couple of days:
So, we're pretending that there's no way Bush could have been an effective President after being in office for eight months because (a) the Democrats (Gore) asked for a recount in Florida; (b) the Democrats (Clinton) stole all the White House furnishings and TP-ed the place before left; and (c) the Democrats (Frank Church, Clinton) destroyed the intelligence services. [Note: this is Judson's scenario, so we're pretending that Bush COULD have been an effective President, if not for the above damage inflicted on him by Democrats. We're also pretending that Bush was elected President.] Okay, then, into this scenario, comes Richard Clarke with the details of the 9/11 plot, and he somehow forces Bush to believe him and agree to take action. What can Bush do to save the country (you know, lacking as he is a desk and a phone and stuff, and being all tired out from having to fight the Florida recount)? Per Judson, if Bush had tried to push the Patriot Act, he would have been impeached by the Democrats and ACLU for being a fascist. If he had ordered an investigation of Islamic groups, then "The nation would have cried that he was a religious bigot bent on imposing Christianity on America." If he had asked for screenings of Middle-Easterners at airports, he "would have been branded a racist, and enemy of civil rights."
Maybe, maybe not. But since Bush has the 9/11 details (al Qaeda terrorists hijack planes and crash them into significant American buildings), then why couldn't he tell the FAA of the plot, and order them to upgrade security screenings of all passengers (and to strictly enforce the already existing regulations prohibiting people from bringing mace, box cutters, and knives on board)? And maybe have the FAA inform pilots and flight crews about a possible terrorist plan to hijack planes, warn them to be extra alert, and tell pilots that under no circumstances should they open the cock pit door in the event the cabin is seized by hijackers. And Bush could order the FBI to more closely monitor all suspected al Qaeda members in the U.S, and he could ask for frequent updates on their activities (both the al Qaeda members and the FBI's counterterrorism units). That's all stuff he could have done as President, and without getting impeached or denounced as a racist. If would require him to actually DO stuff, instead of just talking about someday remaking the Middle East in our image. And it might have cut back on the brush clearing time. But these steps could possibly have prevented 9/11. You know, in this scenario where he has the details of 9/11 plot, but no furniture, and a headache from the Florida recounts. 2:36:36 AM |
Gripes From a Talking DogYoung Kyle Williams complains in his blog about . . .
Yes, why must everyone focus on Kyle's age? Could it be that the ad for his book at the bottom of his WorldNetDaily columns starts out, "In Kyle Williams' book, Seen and Heard, America's youngest national columnist takes on the establishment"? Could it be that the blurb on his own blog begins, "Kyle Williams is 15 years of age"? Kyle, if you market yourself as a 15-year-old pundit, then of course people are going to pay attention to your age (and attribute the immaturity of your ideas and writing to the fact that you're young). If you want them to just focus on your ideas and writing ability, then just present your ideas and writing ability. You know, like Ezra and Jesse do at Pandagon. Unless you're afraid that without your "youth" gimmick, nobody would pay any attention to you . . . 12:07:09 AM |
No comments:
Post a Comment