Cooking With Family CircusToday's Cartoon (You can see it here) Dolly and Jeffy are in pajamas, standing on chairs in front of the stove -- a watchful Mommy is in the background, opening a cupboard door. Dolly is holding a spoon with her right hand and has apparently been stirring the steaming pan of yellow stuff in front of her. She says: "I know how to make scrambled eggs without even followin' a menu." Analysis: Allison suggested that yesterday's cartoon about the wedding bouquet was about our hurried turnover of authority to Iraq's interim government. She may be right -- but I think that she was seeing a little too far into the future, and that her analysis actually applies to today's strip. In today's strip, Dolly (Dubya) has made a mess. Not only has she left a gloppy mixing bowl for somebody else to clean up, but she's spilled eggs on the stove top -- and that will result in billows of smoke and a horrible smell the next time that back burner is used. That's clearly Keane's way of saying that by invading Iraq we have made a mess which will result in problems further down the road -- and while we may think that we won't have to deal with them, everybody in the house will suffer for our lack of care and foresight. More proof of this interpretation is Dolly's claim that she can scramble eggs without "followin' a menu." Of course, a recipe is "a set of instructions for making something from various ingredients," while a menu is "a list of the dishes that may be ordered (as in a restaurant) or that are to be served (as at a banquet)." Dolly optimistic arrogance in a situation where she can't even get her terms right is a clear reference to Bush's claim that rebuilding Iraq would only require "freedom." If you look closely at the cartoon, it appears that Dolly's left hand is under the pan: this is the "hand-off" of sovereignty. The pan is hot, and somebody is going to get burned -- probably both her and Jeffy, who represents the Iraqi people. The hovering Mommy is the U.S. troops who have to stay in the region and take responsibility for the security of the operation. When the kitchen catches on fire, she is the one who will have to try to put it out, even though she is damned sick and tired of both Dolly and Jeffy. Prediction: When Jeffy indicates that he isn't eating Dolly's eggs and wants cereal (an Islamic government) instead, Dolly will order Mommy to force feed them to him. Mommy will, once again, regret ever having had kids. At least, that's one way of looking at it. 6:16:20 AM |
"Templeton Contributes $1 Million to Counter Soros" -- Or Maybe He Doesn'tA couple of days ago NewsMax kindly sent me an email alerting met to this NewsMax story which claimed that "world famous financier Sir John Templeton has donated $1 million through his foundation to a political group that will encourage religious conservatives to vote this November." The NewsMax piece, which was basically just a rewrite of this Washington Times story from the 22nd, indicated that:
Both NewsMax and the Wash Times cited the Barna study that showed that "88 percent of evangelicals are likely to vote, making them the religious group with the greatest voting propensity," and that evangelicals are also the group which is most satisfied with Bush's performance in office, with 89 percent of them giving him a favorable evaluation. You know, because he's helping to usher in Christ's coming by bringing about the apocalypse. A story about Hanna in a local Pennsylvania paper says:
And so Let Freedom Ring is going after those voters by making patriotic, religious commercials to inspire them to vote for Constitution-loving, godly candidates who aren't John Kerry. But the NewsMax piece brings Sir John Templeton, and not just his foundation, into the story. It compare him with George Soros (both are self-made billionaires who have donated a lot of money to their pet causes, but Templeton is good and Soros is evil), and indicates that:
And that's why this story seemed a little odd -- Templeton, while a firm believer of in "free enterprise" and "character development," isn't an evangelical Christian or someone with an interest in politics. He's something of an iconoclast who donates millions each year to "exploring the connections between religion and science." He "often focuses on the importance of humility, saying social and religious conflicts usually result from egos run amok." Here's part of an interview which he gave to the Saturday Evening Post a couple of years ago:
I can't believe that the evangelicals whom Let Freedom Ring is courting would agree with Templeton's plan to allow some healthy competition between religions by exposing students to them all and letting the kiddies pick the one that works best for them. I also don't think that Templeton seems like the type who would want his money being used to make a documentary about Bush, Santorum, and Miller (for no other reason than Templeton's insistance on the virture of humility). So, I found it odd that Templeton was supporting Let Freedom Ring. Especially after I read this bit in a Philadephia Inquirer article from a few years back:
So, it wasn't too suprising to find this "clarification" from Monday's NewsMax:
Since Hanna told that local paper that his group had raised more than $1 million, with most of it coming from "a large contributor, which Hanna declined to identify," and since Jack Templeton is the chairman of Let Freedom Ring, I think it's quite probable that Jack Templeton gave Hanna's group $1 million. Whether he donated his own money, or is playing fast and loose with money from his 91-year-old father's foundation, remains to be seen. P.S. This is my favorite Templeton Foundation program, as mentioned on the Foundation's website:
I wonder if I could get a grant to study how bad metaphors affect character. I've already got a lot of research done, and if the Foundation is giving away $40 million a year, I think I deserve a cut. 4:53:19 AM |
No comments:
Post a Comment