Hoo-HaFrom . . .oh, you know:
Yeah, because what honor would there be in having kerfuffle win the prestigious Merriam-Webster survey through ballot box stuffing? Anyway, since it pays to increase your word power, WSJ, here are some synomyns for "commotion," courtesy of Merriam-Webster:
And here are some synonyms for "Best of the Web":
So, vote for your favorite. In honor of you-know-you. 8:18:02 PM |
Everybody's Worst Nightmare: Ann Coulter!Ann Coulter's column for this week is, predictably, about how political correctness and Jamie Gorelick caused 9/11. Here are the first couple of paragraphs, just to remind you that Ann is an irritating, but inept, liar:
As you will recall, Lehman "revealed" this while he was supposed to be questioning Condi Rice, the National Security Adviser. This is what actually was said:
Since this was part of Condi's testimony to the 9/11 Commission, it made ALL the papers. But I haven't noticed any confirmation of Lehman's revelation from the FAA as yet -- maybe the papers are waiting for that before they use his statement in their headlines (since, if this isn't a sane world, it's at least one where the media, even the Fox News part, has higher journalistic ethics than Ann). And anyway, bin Laden isn't young, so even if Lehman's info and Ann's interpretation of it are correct (which I really, really doubt), he could still be searched, even if two Jordanian cab drivers had already been subjected to "secondary questionning" (for some reason other than their ethnicity, we would hope). And why does Ann think bin Laden is in Newark? Does she have inside info, or is she just slamming Newark because an oafish security screener there actually searched HER unmentionables? For Ann is a big fan of racial profiling, because it can be used to discriminate against swarthy males (which is one of Ann's hobbies), and because she doesn't think the War on Terror should inconvenience her in the slightest (because, you know, she's rich and white). But Ann, if you want to know who to blame for the lack of airline profiling, you might want to start with . . . Phyllis Schlafly! Here are some snippets from a Conservative News Service story from 1999:
So, I think it's clear that Phyllis Schlafly and the Free Congress Foundation are responsible for 9/11. Anyway, the rest of Ann's column is the usual mixture of deliberate distortions, half truths, and outright lies. . . .And in other news, she's giving a speech at Penn State tonight. That's the kind of thing Ben Shapiro must have been referring to when he wrote his book about colleges being Mind Dungeons. Anyway, here's the scoop, per the college paper:
A Liberal's Worst Nightmare would be waking up next to Ann Coulter. Heck, that would cause pretty much any sane person's blood to run cold.
She has a "plethora of knowledge"??? Per Merriam-Webster:
Ann certainly doesn't have an excess (or even an MDA) of knowledge, so I guess Toby was using the first definition (and was delicately referring to Ann's Adam's apple).
While what Coyle meant was that Ann is not afraid to show her tailbone, it's true that she dares to show most of her bones -- because they're poking through her skin.
I admire Coyle for frankly admitting that Ann doesn't have a super speech -- I bet he'd agree that it's downright bad if we pressed him. I like to think that Cyle would been one of the few conservatives to concede that Bush's press conference was the most painfully inept recent peformance not included in Gigli --but that might just be me expecting too much of ol' Patrick. But what with all the recent conservative concern about not exposing kids to Janet Jackson's breast, Howard Stern's bad language and criticism of the President, and basic cable, I don't think Penn State should let Ann tell their students what's going on her in life. I mean, she's the woman who said, "Let's say I go out every night, I meet a guy and have sex with him. Good for me. I'm not married." Of course, that's not very likely to be going on in her life right now, seeing as there aren't that many men that desperate for sex -- but you never know, and we must think of the children. In any case, whatever Ann speaks about, I'm sure it will be hateful, untrue, and well worth her $10,000 educational-rate speaking fee. If anyone attends, let us know all about it. 4:41:00 AM |
Scary Thought for the Day
And our "Criswell of the Day" Award Goes to Glenstonecottage, who commented re the "A Few Thoughts on the Preznit's Press Conference" item:
And here's Taranto, commenting on a Josh Marshall post about the press conference:
Hey, James, if you think that "I believe so strongly in the power of freedom" is a good answer to the question of how you are going to revamp the FBI, then maybe George Bush should make Elmo Oxygen* his running mate. (*You know, because of the "I believe, so strongly, in mayonnaise" line.) 12:33:29 AM |
No comments:
Post a Comment