WorldNetDaily ConfidentialOkay, WorldNetDaily's headline is better: 'Lust-filled women on sex rampage with your kids What's really behind today's epidemic of teacher-student carnal relations ' Sadly, to find out what's behind those sex rampages by lust-filled women, you have to subscribe to WND's Whistleblower magazine, but they do give us some tantalizing hints:
The storyline is certainly not titillating to the person who writes headlines for WND! I'm assuming it was the same person who came up with the headlines for the linked story:"SEXTRA CREDIT Sexy substitute teacher 'has relations with boy' - Woman, 29, facing up to 5 years for illicit activity with 17-year-old." Would WND use a similar headline if the teacher was male? Would they devote a whole issue of their mag to their discovery of an "epidemic" consisting of about 50 adult women in the country having had inappropriate relationships with children over the past 25 years? If so, would they use the headline "Lust Filled Men On (Heterosexual) Sex Rampage With Your Children?" (Since they haven't yet, I'm guessing the answer is "no.") So, my theory is that it's the idea that it's "sexy" for female teachers to have illegal sexual conduct with their students that is behind this "epidemic." But back to WND.
Right. So David "Marketing of Evil" Kupelian's story is that while WND is, well, marketing these stories in a sensationalistic way in order to sell the mag, they actually get way beyond salaciousness and end up uncovering profound truths about the human condition.
"Whistleblower Mag: Shining a thousand-watt spotlight on sexy teachers and their carnal adventures! Their lust-fueled rampages will boggle your mind!"
Yes, some teachers don't see anything wrong with what they're doing, and one (Mary Kay Letourneau) was rewarded with a TV movie, a book deal, years in prison, a divorce, and an international reputation as a pathetic child molester.
Yes, I knew that. I remember the 2004 news reports on the study. It included this bit that WND doesn't mention:
And I also remember that there were concerns about Shakeshaft's methodology (she didn't actually conduct a study, she just analyzed existing studies and came up with a "synthesis" from them). And some of the studies she used included students reports of being on the receiving end of unwelcome "sexual looks" from other students. But hey, WND couldn't be trying to scare you into homeschooling your kids or anything, could they? On a totally different topic, let scroll down to the bottom of their story proving that there is an endless stream of reports of female teachers taking advantage of their underage male charges and see what fine products you can buy from the WND bookstore . .
Of course, way more kids are sexually abused by family members, neighbors and family friends than by teachers, but keep in mind that schools these days are where those lust-filled women are on the prowl, and buy these books from WND so you can keep your kids safe at home! And the important "Predators" issue of Whisteblower has even more
Statutory rape is WRONG! I hope everyone is clear on this now.
It's just a hunch, I'm guessing that Kinsey's name pops up at least once in both of David's articles So, per Dennis, it's the homosexuals who are behind this epidemic? (Maybe because they are refusing to have sex with the lust-filled teachers, who then have to seduce their underage male students?) No wonder Judaism rejected them! But in any case, Dennis's analysis of why Judeo-Christianity should be mandatory in this country is apparently both legendary and award-winning, so I encourage you to believe whatever he said. The most important movie of the year! (The year in question being 1955.) Taglines: "A shock story of today's high school teachers," "I'm a teacher. My pupils are the kind you don't turn
"Under-reported"? I guess Mr. Farah must not watch any of the cable news shows. (While this topic was also a staple on the latest version of "Hard Copy," which wasn't aired on a news network, you can't fault Joseph for having missed it, since it's Nielsen ratings were actually negative numbers.) But hey, this journalistic exposé does sound incredible (and properly disturbing and portentous, and not at all exploitative)! I'd consider subscribing to the mag just for this issue, if I didn't have to get Rebecca Hagelin's book as a free gift. 12:39:19 AM |
The World O' Crap Archive
Welcome to the Collected World O' Crap, a comprehensive library of posts from the original Salon Blog, and our successor site, world-o-crap.com (2006 to 2010).
Current posts can be found here.
Friday, January 21, 2011
March 4, 2006 by s.z.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment