David Limbaugh: Rush Doing Great, Not Becoming Liberal Here's David Limbaugh, speaking to Rush's guest host on Friday:
Okay, I'm really tired: YOU comment on it. Bonus points for explaining what causes "genetic conservatism" 5:53:55 AM |
The "We Dare to Defend Our Rights" State News Normally we leave the Alabama reportage in the capable hands of War Liberal, but Scott is on location near Mobile, cleaning out those malerial swamps that Ann Coulter keeps yapping about (well, actually, he's there working on a horror movie about a hideous race of Ann Coulters that comes out of the swamps to invade our homes, kill our leaders, and eat us). So, we dedicate today's blogging to Scott, and to the fine folks in the "We Dare to Defend Our Rights" state. You know, that state motto SO tempted me to quote the lyrics to a Beastie Boys song. But I don't want to offend anybody, so I'll just quote some "Weird" Al lyrics:
And so on. Al's tribute to the Reagan years. Anyway, our first news item from Alamba is Bush Stumps. Yes, President Bush was in the Granite Boulder State on Saturday, lending his support to the Republican gubernatorial candidate, who is probably another faded action movie actor (possibly Kurt Thomas, star of Gymkata, or maybe Mel Gibson, star of, um, Warrior of the Lost World.)
Well . . my farm implement dealer, Jay-Bob, is a convicted felon and it really makes him mad when I mention voting, but hey, you're the President. And the minister doesn't like it when I interrupt worship services to remind people they have a duty, nay a GOD-GIVEN OBLIGATION to vote Republican, I'll try to follow orders.
You know, I bet if we tried "faith-based national defense," in which we allowed religious groups to administer some goverment-funded defense programs, we could make even MORE tax cuts. Let the Baptist Ladies Society invade one of those Muslim countries that is causing us some much grief--General Boykin could lead 'em into battle against Satan--and we could save money on veterans benefits. Well, we do that already, but I bet we could save more! And this could also free up some time for the federal goverment to work on education, since reading books to school children is arguably what the President does best. But I'm sure you already know, the big excitement during the President's stumping in the South was Woman 'Snaps,' Crashes Car Into Arena Where Bush Gave Speech. It seems that a woman with three kids in her car drove through a security barrier and slammed into the outside of the convention center where Bush had just finished speaking. While Bush wasn't hurt and the woman (Betina Mixon) wasn't even trying to get him, the reason this incident is of concern is that if the woman's car had been loaded with explosives, she might have blown up the President when she hit the building. But luckily for all concerned, she wasn't one of those suiciders, she was just a stressed-out woman who snapped and drove through the barrier, looking for her mother-in-law -- possibly to make her take the kids, and possibly to run her over (the investigation is still ongoing). So, basically this was just like that Simpsons ep where the overburdened Marge had the breakdown in her car on the bridge, except this time the President happened to be in the vicinity. The Simpsons resolved things by sending Marge on a vacation to Rancho Relaxo. I think that a national policy of sending overworked mothers on vacations before the President comes stumping in their towns should be a top national priority--because next time, we might not be so lucky Our next item concerns how to get tickets to the most exciting event taking place in Alabama this year: The Judge Roy Moore Trial:
Because everybody has a constitutional right to media access. I mean, geez, what's the use of even HAVING an ethics trial if you can't use it to play to the crowd about how you were just following God's commandment to put large boulders in public buildings, and so they should send you to Congress. But despite all that, the Court of the Judiciary (COJ) ruled that the trial will be held in the 210-seat Supreme Court courtroom. Moore's legal team said this meant that Moore wasn't going to get a fair trial, and "advised him that in light of the rulings of the COJ denying him his basic legal rights, that an adverse ruling from the COJ is inevitable, which may well include his imminent removal from office." So, basically they're saying that if their client didn't get the big court room, it means the court hates him and hates God, and Moore has already lost his case, so he might as well start his congressional campaign now, and his followers might as well start harassing the COJ now. They also wouldn't let his attorneys have the records they wanted:
I think I see the legal strategy that the defense was going to use by requesting these documents: first, they were going to show that members of the Court of the Judiciary are selected by secularists who want other secularists on the team, and therefore they are completely unworthy to judge a man such as Roy Moore, who was called by GOD HIMSELF to become a judge. And secondly, the defense wanted to prove that court officials have been threatened by Moore's followers, proving that Moore HAD to keep the 10 Commandments monument in the state building, despite the order from the federal judge, because otherwise they'd kill him -- they are just that wacko and dangerous! Keeping the boulder there was self-defense! I hope they are able to find some other evidence they can use to make these points. Oh, and if you want to get tickets:
I hope Scott can attend. In other Roy Moore news, Maude Rathgeber of New Mexico recently flew to St. Louis to hear him speak. Or so reports the Alamogordo News ("Serving the Tularosa Basin since 1898") in this exclusive story: Eagle Forum leader attends her 28th national conference. David Limbaugh also spoke. Per Mrs. Rathgeber:
As noted in the headline, this makes the 28th year in a row that Mrs. Rathgeber has attended the national Eagle Forum Conference.
Yes, having to ask your husband for money shows that you're the kind of woman that Phyllis Schlafly would approve of (even if they always DO give "Homemaker of the Year" to some bigshot's trophy housewife), and proof that her Eagle Forum is still a force to be reckoned with. Bottom line: you don't get stories this THIS from the secular NY Times, and despite the pessimism of Moore's attorneys, Mrs. Rathbeger is sure the Lord is with him and will bring him through the case, so they should buck up and start planning the victory celebration. Well, that was my bottom line. But kiddy pundit Kyle Williams has another one. His is:
Of course, he's talking about how the evil democrats filibustered judicial appeals court nominee Pickering, who is from Mississippi, which is CLOSE to Alabama, making this column (The judiciary: America's new power center) relevant to today's theme. And besides, Roy Moore has said basically the same thing as Kyle, as has Bill O'Reilly, who is from the Westbury section of Alabama. Anyway, Kyle sees the filibustering as a sign that the Republic is hanging on by a thread:
Um, skipping over the idea that "As much as some would like the President to be a dicator, he really can't be, alas," I have to say that the only people I hear "pushing a constitutional ammendment" these days are the one who want one prohibiting homosexual marriage. But they're not liberals, they're Republicans! And I don't think the 5th District Court of Appeals GETS to ammend the Constitution anyway, so how would Pickering's appointment help them do it?
Okay, per young Kyle, the founding fathers, wanting to ensure the republic didn't didn't become a monarchy, arranged for a system where the power was divided into three branches of goverment: the executive, the legislative, and the judicial. And they also set up three groups who were supposed to trample on the desires of evil, power-thirsty politicans (i.e., the Democratic ones -- the Republican ones are righteous, and so power-sated they just can't drink another drop); these groups being the voters, the media, and the judiciary. And we are currently veering away sharply from what the Founding Fathers wanted, as demonstrated by the fact that the Republicans don't control all three branches of goverment. If only the voters weren't apathetic and the media wasn't in cahoots with the Democrats, then they would do something about the liberal-leaning judges! Probably send them threatening letters. The judges we have now are tyrants who don't follow the constitution, and so we can't have prayers before football games, and we have to have a complete separation between religion and government, even though the majority of Americans don't want this. Per Kyle, our only recourse is to elect Presidents who will nominate conservative, godly, constitutional judges, and who will fight for their nominees by shooting the filibusterers. Or something like that. And then nobody will care about the judiciary any more, and things can get back to the way they should be: "still corrupt, but not as tyrannical." And this concludes our Alabama coverage. If your state ever does anything interesting, we'll try to do the same for it. 5:48:17 AM |
No comments:
Post a Comment