Who Said It? (Canadian Edition)Right off the bat, D. Sidhe got both of our previous Mystery Guests. The one who predicted a "battle of enormous proportions from sea to shining sea" if he doesn't get the Supreme Court Justices he wants was indeed James Dobson. Here's another quote from that same Focus on the Family newsletter:
And yes, it was William Safire who told us about the "idealistic neocons" and the "plodding, pragmatic paleocons" who would inevitably "fuzz" the GOP's winning character. (At least, the NY Times said it was Safire -- all that alliteration does remind one of Doug Giles, doesn't it?) Congrats, D. Sidhe -- you win Safire's position as NY Times columnist! But first, you have to get Dobson raptured. Now, on to today's Mystery Guests, all of whom are Canadian in honor of how Canada has made it illegal to quote the Bible.
Yeah, he really said that he thinks that it's worse to wear Arabic robes than it is to dress up like a Nazi -- and his reasoning is that England is no danger from Hitler, while some people who wear keffiyehs are terrorists. I'm sure his next piece will be about how the 9/11 terrorists dressed like Americans, and so journalists should be picking on people who dress like Americans, and not on "poor Harry." Oh, and if you check out his linked article, you'll note that it's a 1997 piece from Daniel Pipes' "Middle East Quarterly" which claims that Charles is a little too fond of Islam, and which quotes gossip from the tabloid The Sunday Mirror about Princess Diana possibly marrying a Muslim cardiac surgeon. However, it doesn't say one word about Charles wearing bedouin robes around the house.
"Al Qaeda" is just "meaningless media shorthand" now? Then why does George Bush keep telling us stuff like, "I have got a comprehensive strategy to not only chase down al-Qaeda wherever it exists — and we're making progress, three-quarters of al-Qaeda leaders have been brought to justice"? And "gazillions" of Western Muslims have graduated from Afhan terror camps and are just awaiting word to start attacking us? Um, could I see some data to support that? Heck, even a link to a dated, bogus article by Daniel Pipes that doesn't even address this claim would be better than nothing. And does anybody except this guy (and maybe Michelle Malkin) EVER try to lump the Washington snipers in with al Qaeda? And if we get to pick one Canadian to deport, can it be this one?
The tsunami hit on December 26. Bush made his first statement about it (from his ranch in Crawford) on December 29th. This pundit apparently thinks that George would need to have have eerie autistic abilities in order to figure out in less than three days that a horrific natural disaster had hit a large portion of the world, and so be able to say something sympathetic and helpful to the afflicted nations. Sure, the liberals might think that he could have seen something about it on TV, but this pundit says that Memogate has proved that we can never trust TV when it shows us footage of waves knocking down buildings, wrecked towns, and children who claim to have seen their parents swept out to sea (the little fiends could be TERRORISTS, after all). Here's another paragraph from this person:
While this sounds like Ann Coulter, it's just an incredible simulation. 3:06:20 AM |
The World O' Crap Archive
Welcome to the Collected World O' Crap, a comprehensive library of posts from the original Salon Blog, and our successor site, world-o-crap.com (2006 to 2010).
Current posts can be found here.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
December 17, 2005 by s.z.
Labels:
Guest Column
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment