Yes, it's a new line of Cafe Press merchandise: the i heart gitmo collection! (I think the creepiest item is the "i heart gitmo" classic thong.) Link via Powerline Blog, your source of info on all the best torture humor. And that brings us to James Lileks latest screed. It's about how "the hard left" shouldn't be allowed to endanger the war by talking about Gitmo any more. In it, Lileks provides a way to reach consensus with these traitors, whiners, and big stupid babies.
What a stupid post. And I have a solution: that Lileks be forced to watch that Star Trek ep until he gets its point (which was that if you want a war, you should be forced to confront war's brutality). Because it's clear that despite using this ep as the basis of his post, he doesn't get it. If he got the point, he'd realize that If he wants to claim that some torture is necessary (and is just fine by him), then he should have the guts to write what it is that he wants done to other human beings by representatives of his country. He can't say "insufficient air conditioning," he has to say, "I think it's perfectly acceptable if people suspected (but not charged, tried, or convicted) of being terrorists or terrorist associates are kept in unventilated rooms at temperatures of well over 100° until they are almost unconscious, and literally pull out their hair". Instead of saying, "excess air conditioning," he has to write, "I want my government to subject barefoot, lightly clad prisoners to temperatures of circa 40° so that they will shake with cold." Instead of saying, "being chained to the floor, and other forms of psychological stress," he has to write, "I demand that interrogators keep detainees in unbearably hot rooms for days at a time, while also subjecting them to extremely loud rap music -- oh, and the detainees should also be chained hand and foot in the fetal position on the tile floor." And so on. If he wants to talk tough, then he damned well should should talk tough. Oh, and if he wants to talk tough, then he should show that he is tough, by volunteering to spend a couple of days in a pleasant 70° room, sitting unconfined in the comfy chair, listening to Shatner's Transformed Man. 5:50:30 AM |
Some Good Stuff You'll Enjoy (Or Your Money Back)1. Over at Sadly, No!, Brad and Gavin have been blogging up a storm. Brad brings us Debbie Schlussel's arch rivals, Debbie Daniel & Kaye Grogan. So, read Brad's post and then try to decide who's the fruitcakiest: Debbie D., Kaye, or Little Debbie Snackcakes (a hat tip to whoever was the first to come up with that moniker; and a whole hat to Chris V for the lovely logo). And if you aren't following Gavin's hardboiled tales of a private dick in Wingnuttown, well, you should. Start with the first chapter, and then keep on reading until Brad stops writing. You do know how to read, don't you? You just use your eyes to send images to your brain, which assigns them meaning ... um, big boy. 2. Steve of No More Mister Nice Blog discovers the latest threat to the physical and emotional well-being of your children: zany fonts. Really. 3. Mark at Fried Green al-Qaedas writes about the media frenzy that resulted when a black man went missing. And in other news, Mark takes a bullet for the cause and listens to all three hours of the Rush Limbaugh show (like Steve Martin once said, comedy is not pretty, and neither is Rush). Plus, Ann Coulter talks to Rupert Murdoch about her getting own Fox News program, and then she writes her dated column about Gitmo. Wackiness and hunger ensues. 4. Ol' Doghouse Riley from Bats Left Throws Right discusses his hatred of blockbusters (the movies, not the video store) . Here's a free sample:
You'll have to read the whole thing to learn why it wasn't worth it. Here's the the Joe Bob Briggs review of this post: two breasts, one dead shark, Atlanta burning-fu, and two terms of Reagan. Joe Bob says check it out. 6. David at Journalists Against Bush's B.S. (AKA JABBS) blogs about the Pentagon's plan to win the war with comic books. He also discusses what Dr. Hammesfahr (who was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in medicine, the world's most prestigious award in that field, as you know) said on "Hannity & Colmes" and "Scarborough Country" about the Schiavo autopsy results. 7. Julia of Sisyphus Shrugged brings you the info that the NY Times apparently didn't have room to mention in the article where they reported Dr. Bill Frist's claim that he never said that Terri Schiavo wasn't in a PV state, and would never dream of making a medical diagnosis without having examined the patient. (Maybe the Times could use a smaller font in order to include this kind of info in the future.) More recommended reading tomorrow. Until then, feel free to comment on how much better you like the above blogs than mine. You can also add your own recommendations . (And if YOU would like to be one of our recommended bloggers, just send me $10 in small, unmarked bills -- but don't tell the police, or you'll never see your blog alive again!) 4:03:43 AM |
No comments:
Post a Comment